Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Oroantral Communication after Tooth Extraction Utilizing Preoperative Panoramic Radiography

被引:13
作者
Vollmer, Andreas [1 ]
Saravi, Babak [2 ]
Vollmer, Michael [3 ]
Lang, Gernot Michael [2 ]
Straub, Anton [1 ]
Brands, Roman C. [1 ]
Kuebler, Alexander [1 ]
Gubik, Sebastian [1 ]
Hartmann, Stefan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Wurzburg, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Plast Surg, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Fac Med, Dept Orthoped & Trauma Surg, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] Tuebingen Univ Hosp, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Osianderstr 2-8, D-72076 Tubingen, Germany
关键词
artificial intelligence; deep learning; X-ray; tooth extraction; oroantral fistula; operative planning; CLASSIFICATION; TEETH;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics12061406
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Oroantral communication (OAC) is a common complication after tooth extraction of upper molars. Profound preoperative panoramic radiography analysis might potentially help predict OAC following tooth extraction. In this exploratory study, we evaluated n = 300 consecutive cases (100 OAC and 200 controls) and trained five machine learning algorithms (VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, and ResNet50) to predict OAC versus non-OAC (binary classification task) from the input images. Further, four oral and maxillofacial experts evaluated the respective panoramic radiography and determined performance metrics (accuracy, area under the curve (AUC), precision, recall, F1-score, and receiver operating characteristics curve) of all diagnostic approaches. Cohen's kappa was used to evaluate the agreement between expert evaluations. The deep learning algorithms reached high specificity (highest specificity 100% for InceptionV3) but low sensitivity (highest sensitivity 42.86% for MobileNetV2). The AUCs from VGG16, InceptionV3, MobileNetV2, EfficientNet, and ResNet50 were 0.53, 0.60, 0.67, 0.51, and 0.56, respectively. Expert 1-4 reached an AUC of 0.550, 0.629, 0.500, and 0.579, respectively. The specificity of the expert evaluations ranged from 51.74% to 95.02%, whereas sensitivity ranged from 14.14% to 59.60%. Cohen's kappa revealed a poor agreement for the oral and maxillofacial expert evaluations (Cohen's kappa: 0.1285). Overall, present data indicate that OAC cannot be sufficiently predicted from preoperative panoramic radiography. The false-negative rate, i.e., the rate of positive cases (OAC) missed by the deep learning algorithms, ranged from 57.14% to 95.24%. Surgeons should not solely rely on panoramic radiography when evaluating the probability of OAC occurrence. Clinical testing of OAC is warranted after each upper-molar tooth extraction.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1978, An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence: Can Computers Think?
[2]   Covid-19: automatic detection from X-ray images utilizing transfer learning with convolutional neural networks [J].
Apostolopoulos, Ioannis D. ;
Mpesiana, Tzani A. .
PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2020, 43 (02) :635-640
[3]   Sample-Size Determination Methodologies for Machine Learning in Medical Imaging Research: A Systematic Review [J].
Balki, Indranil ;
Amirabadi, Afsaneh ;
Levman, Jacob ;
Martel, Anne L. ;
Emersic, Ziga ;
Meden, Blaz ;
Garcia-Pedrero, Angel ;
Ramirez, Saul C. ;
Kong, Dehan ;
Moody, Alan R. ;
Tyrrell, Pascal N. .
CANADIAN ASSOCIATION OF RADIOLOGISTS JOURNAL-JOURNAL DE L ASSOCIATION CANADIENNE DES RADIOLOGISTES, 2019, 70 (04) :344-353
[4]  
Bergstra J, 2012, J MACH LEARN RES, V13, P281
[5]   Contributions of reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the localization of third molars relative to the maxillary sinus [J].
Bouquet, A ;
Coudert, JL ;
Bourgeois, D ;
Mazoyer, JF ;
Bossard, D .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2004, 98 (03) :342-347
[6]  
Camelyon17, CAMELYON17 GRAND CHA
[7]   Deep Learning for the Radiographic Detection of Apical Lesions [J].
Ekert, Thomas ;
Krois, Joachim ;
Meinhold, Leonie ;
Elhennawy, Karim ;
Emara, Ramy ;
Golla, Tatiana ;
Schwendicke, Falk .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 2019, 45 (07) :917-922
[8]   Artificial Intelligence for Medical Image Analysis: A Guide for Authors and Reviewers [J].
England, Joseph R. ;
Cheng, Phillip M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 212 (03) :513-519
[9]  
Ganin Y, 2017, ADV COMPUT VIS PATT, P189, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-58347-1_10
[10]   Potential Biases in Machine Learning Algorithms Using Electronic Health Record Data [J].
Gianfrancesco, Milena A. ;
Tamang, Suzanne ;
Yazdany, Jinoos ;
Schmajuk, Gabriela .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 178 (11) :1544-1547