Photomask CD and LER characterization using Mueller Matrix Spectroscopic Ellipsometry

被引:2
作者
Heinrich, A. [1 ]
Dirnstorfer, I. [1 ]
Bischoff, J. [2 ]
Meiner, K. [3 ]
Ketelsen, H. [3 ]
Richter, U. [3 ]
Mikolajick, T. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] NaMLab gGmbH, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
[2] Osires, D-98693 Ilmenau, Germany
[3] Sentech Instruments GmbH, D-12489 Berlin, Germany
[4] Tech Univ Dresden, Inst Semicond & Microsystems, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
来源
30TH EUROPEAN MASK AND LITHOGRAPHY CONFERENCE | 2014年 / 9231卷
关键词
Mueller matrix; spectroscopic ellipsometry; RCWA; photomask; line edge roughness; critical dimension; GRATINGS;
D O I
10.1117/12.2065670
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Critical dimension and line edge roughness on photomask arrays are determined with Mueller matrix spectroscopic ellipsometry. Arrays with large sinusoidal perturbations are measured for different azimuth angels and compared with simulations based on rigorous coupled wave analysis. Experiment and simulation show that line edge roughness leads to characteristic changes in the different Mueller matrix elements. The influence of line edge roughness is interpreted as an increase of isotropic character of the sample. The changes in the Mueller matrix elements are very similar when the arrays are statistically perturbed with rms roughness values in the nanometer range suggesting that the results on the sinusoidal test structures are also relevant for "real" mask errors. Critical dimension errors and line edge roughness have similar impact on the SE MM measurement. To distinguish between both deviations, a strategy based on the calculation of sensitivities and correlation coefficients for all Mueller matrix elements is shown. The Mueller matrix elements M-13/M-31 and M-34/M-43 are the most suitable elements due to their high sensitivities to critical dimension errors and line edge roughness and, at the same time, to a low correlation coefficient between both influences. From the simulated sensitivities, it is estimated that the measurement accuracy has to be in the order of 0.01 and 0.001 for the detection of 1 nm critical dimension error and 1 nm line edge roughness, respectively.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Effective medium approximations for modeling optical reflectance from gratings with rough edges [J].
Bergner, Brent C. ;
Germer, Thomas A. ;
Suleski, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2010, 27 (05) :1083-1090
[2]   Perturbation approach applied to modal diffraction methods [J].
Bischoff, Joerg ;
Hehl, Karl .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2011, 28 (05) :859-867
[3]   Fast diffraction computation schema for multilayer crossed gratings containing layers with 1D periodicity [J].
Bischoff, Joerg .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 2010, 27 (01) :116-122
[4]  
Bodermann B., 2009, EUV DUV SCATTEROMETR
[5]  
Bunday B., 2013, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS
[6]  
Chen X., 2011, 10 INT S MEAS TECHN
[7]  
Foldyna M., 2011, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS
[8]   Generalized ellipsometry of artificially designed line width roughness [J].
Foldyna, Martin ;
Germer, Thomas A. ;
Bergner, Brent C. ;
Dixson, Ronald G. .
THIN SOLID FILMS, 2011, 519 (09) :2633-2636
[9]   Sensitivity analysis for OMOG and EUV photomasks characterized by UV-NIR Spectroscopic Ellipsometry [J].
Heinrich, A. ;
Dirnstorfer, I. ;
Bischoff, J. ;
Meiner, K. ;
Richter, U. ;
Mikolajick, T. .
PHOTOMASK TECHNOLOGY 2013, 2013, 8880
[10]  
Heinrich A., 2013, P SOC PHOTO-OPT INS