Use of effective dose to assess x-ray protective clothing

被引:5
作者
Eder, Heinrich [1 ]
Schlattl, Helmut [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Bavarian Environm Agcy, Priv Stadtpk 43, D-81243 Munich, Germany
[2] Helmholtz Zentrum Munchen, Inst Radiat Med, Ingolstadter Landstr 1, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
[3] Fed Off Radiat Protect, Ingolstadter Landstr 1, D-85764 Oberschleissheim, Germany
关键词
effective dose; protective clothing; protection factor; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARDS; WORKING;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6498/ac191a
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This review article provides an overview on the results of studies conducted by the authors to improve the current personal protection concept in the clinical application of x-rays. With the aid of personal dose equivalent measurements during radiologically guided clinical interventions, laboratory tests using the Alderson-Rando phantom as well as Monte Carlo simulations various x-ray application scenarios were investigated. The organ doses and the effective doses of staff persons standing near the patient were determined. The 3D-attenuation properties of protective clothing under the scattered radiation emitted by the patient play a special role here. With regard to the minimisation of the quantity 'effective dose' the protection of the lower body from the gonads to the chest is of particular importance, since 80% of the effective dose is contributed by this region of the body. In contrast, protection of the back plays a subordinate role. Protective aprons optimised in terms of effective dose can be significantly lighter than conventional aprons, providing equal protection. The assessment of the attenuation properties of protective clothing should be based on the risk-related dose quantity, effective dose, rather than lead equivalent. In the future, the evaluation of radiation protective clothing could be based on the calculation of the effective dose assuming standardised irradiation conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:R140 / R151
页数:12
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2009, ANN ICR P
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, STRAHLENSCHUTZGESETZ
  • [3] Shielding effectiveness of X-ray protective garment
    Eder, H.
    Schlattl, H.
    [J]. PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 82 : 343 - 350
  • [4] TERTIARY X-RADIATION-A PROBLEM FOR STAFF PROTECTION?
    Eder, H.
    Seidenbusch, M.
    Oechler, L. S.
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2020, 189 (03) : 304 - 311
  • [5] Eder H, 2021, RADIOLOGE, V61, P386, DOI 10.1007/s00117-021-00809-3
  • [6] Occupational hazards of interventional cardiologists: Prevalence of orthopedic health problems in contemporary practice
    Goldstein, JA
    Baiter, S
    Cowley, M
    Hodgson, J
    Klein, LW
    [J]. CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2004, 63 (04) : 407 - 411
  • [7] Orthopedic Afflictions in the Interventional Laboratory Tales From the Working Wounded
    Goldstein, James A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2015, 65 (08) : 827 - 829
  • [8] RADIATION EXPOSURE TO THE BACK WITH DIFFERENT TYPES OF APRONS
    Hong, Seung Wan
    Kim, Tae Won
    Kim, Jae Hun
    [J]. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2021, 193 (3-4) : 185 - 189
  • [9] ICRP publication 103, ANN ICR, V37, P2
  • [10] International Commission on Radiological Protection, 2021, ANN ICRP, V50, DOI [10.1177/0146645320911864, DOI 10.1177/0146645320911864]