Utility of dilation and curettage in the diagnosis of pregnancy of unknown location

被引:43
作者
Shaunik, Alka
Kulp, Jennifer [3 ]
Appleby, Dina H. [2 ]
Sammel, Mary D. [2 ]
Barnhart, Kurt T. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Yale Univ, Dept Reprod Med, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
dilation and curettage; ectopic pregnancy; pregnancy of unknown location; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2010.11.021
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine utility of uterine evacuation for diagnosis of nonviable pregnancy of unknown location (PUL). STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cohort study to assess the prevalence of ectopic pregnancy (EP), overall, and stratified by presenting signs and symptoms in women with a nonviable PUL. RESULTS: Of the 173 women, 66 (38%) had miscarriage (spontaneous abortion [SAB]) and 107 (62%) had EP. When initial human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) was < 2000 mIU/mL, the odds of an EP were greater (odds ratio, 4.32; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-9.12). Demographic factors, obstetric history, and clinical presentation were not useful in distinguishing between EP and SAB. Pre-evacuation hCG increase had strong trend association with EP (odds ratio, 2.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-4.68). A > 30% fall in postcurettage hCG was suggestive, but was not a diagnostic indicator of SAB. CONCLUSION: Uterine evacuation is a useful diagnostic aid for women with nonviable PUL. Nondiagnostic ultrasound findings and absolute and serial hCG values are associated with, but do not accurately predict final diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:130.e1 / 130.e6
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   ECTOPIC PREGNANCY - 10 COMMON PITFALLS IN DIAGNOSIS [J].
ABBOTT, J ;
EMMANS, LS ;
LOWENSTEIN, SR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1990, 8 (06) :515-522
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of presumptively medically treating women at risk for ectopic pregnancy compared with first performing a dilatation and curettage [J].
Ailawadi, M ;
Lorch, SA ;
Barnhart, KT .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (02) :376-382
[3]   Presumed diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy [J].
Barnhart, KT ;
Katz, I ;
Hummel, A ;
Gracia, CR .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 100 (03) :505-510
[4]   Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound above and below the beta-hCG discriminatory zone [J].
Barnhart, KT ;
Simhan, H ;
Kamelle, SA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1999, 94 (04) :583-587
[5]  
Barnhart KT, 2010, FERTIL STERIL
[6]   DIAGNOSIS OF ECTOPIC PREGNANCY BY VAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN COMBINATION WITH A DISCRIMINATORY SERUM HCG LEVEL OF 1000-IU/1 (IRP) [J].
CACCIATORE, B ;
STENMAN, UH ;
YLOSTALO, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1990, 97 (10) :904-908
[7]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1995, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V44, P46
[8]   The accuracy of transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy prior to surgery [J].
Condous, G ;
Okaro, E ;
Khalid, A ;
Lu, C ;
Van Huffel, S ;
Timmerman, D ;
Bourne, T .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (05) :1404-1409
[9]   Patient acceptability of manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy loss [J].
Edwards, Scott ;
Tureck, Richard ;
Fredrick, Margaret ;
Huang, Xiangke ;
Zhang, Jun ;
Barnhart, Kurt .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2007, 16 (10) :1429-1436
[10]  
Kirk E, 2008, OBSTET GYNAECOL REPR, V19, P3