Surgical treatment of Type II odontoid fractures: anterior odontoid screw fixation or posterior cervical instrumented fusion?

被引:52
|
作者
Joaquim, Andrei F. [1 ]
Patel, Alpesh A. [2 ]
机构
[1] State Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Dept Neurol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
关键词
odontoid fractures; approach; treatment; anterior odontoid screw fixation; posterior cervical instrumented fusion; HALO-VEST IMMOBILIZATION; ELDERLY-PATIENTS; AXIS FRACTURES; NONOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT; POPULATION; INCREASES; DENS;
D O I
10.3171/2015.1.FOCUS14781
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Odontoid fractures comprise as many as 20% of all cervical spine fractures. Fractures at the dens base, classified by the Anderson and D'Alonzo system as Type II injuries, are the most common pattern of all odontoid fractures and are also the most common cervical injuries in patients older than 70 years of age. Surgical treatment is recommended for patients older than 50 years with Type II odontoid fractures, as well as in patients at a high risk for nonunion. Anterior odontoid screw fixation (AOSF) and posterior cervical instrumented fusion (PCIF) are both well-accepted techniques for surgical treatment but with unique indications and contraindications as well as varied reported outcomes. In this paper, the authors review the literature about specific patients and fracture characteristics that may guide treatment toward one technique over the other. AOSF can preserve atlantoaxial motion, but requires a reduced odontoid, an intact transverse ligament, and a favorable fracture line to achieve adequate fracture compression. Additionally, older patients may have a higher rate of pseudarthrosis using this technique, as well as postoperative dysphagia. PCIF has a higher rate of fusion and is indicated in patients with severe atlantoaxial misalignment and with poor bone quality. PCIF allows direct open reduction of displaced fragments and can reduce any atlantoaxial subluxation. It is also used as a salvage procedure after failed AOSF. However, this technique results in loss of atlantoaxial motion, requires prone positioning, and demands a longer operative duration than AOSF, factors that can be a challenge in patients with severe medical conditions. Although both anterior and posterior approaches are acceptable, many clinical and radiological factors should be taken into account when choosing the best surgical approach. Surgeons must be prepared to perform both procedures to adequately treat these injuries.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 6
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly
    Robinson, Yohan
    Robinson, Anna-Lena
    Olerud, Claes
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 2014
  • [22] Rigid cervical collar treatment for geriatric type II odontoid fractures
    Robert W. Molinari
    Oner A. Khera
    William L. Gruhn
    Ryan W. McAssey
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 855 - 862
  • [23] Management of odontoid fractures using anterior screw fixation:: analysis of 15 cases
    Dantas, FLR
    Prandini, MN
    Caíres, ACV
    Fonseca, GD
    Raso, JL
    ARQUIVOS DE NEURO-PSIQUIATRIA, 2002, 60 (3B) : 823 - 829
  • [24] Management of Type II Odontoid Fractures in Adults
    Bronson, Wesley H.
    Protopsaltis, Themistocles
    BULLETIN OF THE HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, 2019, 77 (01): : 4 - 10
  • [25] Comparison of fusion rates between rod-based laminar claw hook and posterior cervical screw constructs in Type II odontoid fractures
    Maciejczak, Andrzej
    Wolan-Nieroda, Andzelina
    Jablonska-Sudol, Katarzyna
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2015, 46 (07): : 1304 - 1310
  • [26] Fusion rates for odontoid fractures after treatment by anterior odontoid screw versus posterior C1–C2 arthrodesis: a meta-analysis
    Li Baogui
    Chen Juwen
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2019, 139 : 1329 - 1337
  • [27] Anterior Odontoid Screw Fixation for C2 Fractures: Surgical Nuances, Complications, and Factors Affecting Fracture Union
    Tyagi, Gaurav
    Patel, Kautilya R.
    Singh, Gyani Jail
    Uppar, Alok Mohan
    Beniwal, Manish
    Rao, Kannepalli Venkata Lakkshmana Narsina
    Pruthi, Nupur
    Bhat, Dhananjaya
    Somanna, Sampath
    Chandramouli, Bangalore
    Dwarakanath, Srinivas
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 : E279 - E288
  • [28] A Systematic Review of the Treatment of Geriatric Type II Odontoid Fractures
    Schroeder, Gregory D.
    Kepler, Christopher K.
    Kurd, Mark F.
    Paul, Jonathan T.
    Rubenstein, Robyn N.
    Harrop, James S.
    Brodke, Darrel S.
    Chapman, Jens R.
    Vaccaro, Alexander R.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 77 : S6 - S14
  • [29] Short-Term Complications of Anterior Fixation of Odontoid Fractures
    Cutler, Holt S.
    Guzman, Javier Z.
    Lee, Nathan J.
    Kothari, Parth
    Kim, Jun S.
    Shin, John I.
    Leven, Dante M.
    Cho, Samuel K.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 8 (01) : 47 - 56
  • [30] Fusion rates for conservative and surgical management of type II odontoid fractures and its impact
    Harris, Lauren
    Arif, Shahswar
    Elliot, Matthew
    Brady, Zarina
    Lawrence, Alistair
    Lee, Cheong
    Tsang, Kevin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 35 (05) : 607 - 610