Learning or Memorization: Self-Directed Medical School Curriculum and the Dangers of Overemphasizing Student Selected Ancillary Resources

被引:3
|
作者
Varkey, Thomas C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Merhavy, Zachary I. [4 ]
Varkey, Rhonda M. J.
Ding, Jack B. [5 ]
Varkey, John A. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dell Med Sch, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Grand Canyon Univ, Colangelo Coll Business, Phoenix, AZ 85013 USA
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Coll Educ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Ross Univ, Sch Med, Bridgetown, Barbados
[5] Univ Adelaide, Adelaide Med Sch, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[6] Univ Notre Dame, Coll Engn, Notre Dame, IN USA
关键词
Medical Students; Curriculum; Education;
D O I
10.21802/gmj.2022.1.1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
This article is a response to an opinion article, authored by Wu JH et al. and published in JAMA 2021, vol 326 (20) which suggested that the pre-clinical (first two) years of medical school curriculum should revolve around "high-yield" resources as the dominant teaching tool. The article posited that this highly controversial view was the best way to engage with students and was published in a well-read and utilized medical journal. Due to the growing divide between learning resources provided by medical schools and outside resources actually utilized by students, the conclusions drawn in the mentioned opinion article were understandable but interpreted in the wrong vein. Herein, the authors review landmark changes in medical education over the last century and the underpinning rationale to preface their examination of the suggested changes from the mentioned opinion article. The authors conclude with recommendations from a student perspective and a continuation of the last 100 years of advancements.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条