Laudan, friedman and the role of the a priori in science

被引:0
作者
McArthur, Dan [1 ]
机构
[1] York Univ, N York, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.5840/jpr20073231
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper critically contrasts Laudan's normative naturalism with Friedman's arguments about the importance of a priori concepts in scientific methodology. I do not take issue with Laudan's claim that taking philosophy and science to be continuous does not preclude a normative role for the philosophy of science. The main focus of criticism instead is Laudan's assertion that if normative philosophy employs the methods found in the sciences themselves, then this precludes any a priori or philosophical justification of methodological rules. I make the case that not only are such justifications possible, they are central to any proper philosophical understanding of scientific methodology, and must figure prominently in any plausible version of normative naturalism. To make this case I sketch Laudan's position and his reasons for the ban on a priori justification. I then contrast Laudan's position with Friedman's recent studies on the prominence of relativised constitutive a priori principles within science and show that this view can serve as the basis of a contrasting variation of naturalised philosophy of science. I elucidate Friedman's position in order to identify some prima facie difficulties with Laudan's ban on the a priori in our understanding of science but also to provide an example of a competing variation of philosophical naturalism. Finally, I further highlight the difficulties that attend Laudan's position through a case study, the central methodological role of renormalisation in quantum field theory.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 190
页数:22
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SCRUTINIZING SCI EMP
[2]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS FDN QUANTUM F
[3]   THE CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS AND THE PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS OF RENORMALIZATION THEORY [J].
CAO, TY ;
SCHWEBER, SS .
SYNTHESE, 1993, 97 (01) :33-108
[4]   THE RENORMALIZATION METHOD IN QUANTUM ELECTRODYNAMICS [J].
DYSON, FJ .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1951, 207 (1090) :395-401
[5]  
FEYNMAN R, 1963, THEORY FUNDAMENTAL P
[6]  
Friedman Michael., 2001, Dynamics of Reason: The 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University
[7]  
Friedman Michael, 1999, RECONSIDERING LOGICA
[8]  
Friedman Michael, 1997, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, V71, P7
[9]   THE RENORMALIZATION-GROUP AND EFFECTIVE-FIELD THEORIES [J].
HUGGETT, N ;
WEINGARD, R .
SYNTHESE, 1995, 102 (01) :171-194
[10]  
LAUDAN L, 1987, AM PHILOS QUART, V24, P19