Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a reamed retrograde locking nail

被引:64
作者
Boer, Ronald
Mader, Konrad
Pennig, Dietmar
Verheyen, Cees C. P. M.
机构
[1] Weezenlanden Hosp, Isala Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg & Traumatol, NL-8000 GM Zwolle, Netherlands
[2] St Vinzenz Hosp, Dept Trauma & Orthopaed Surg, Cologne, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1097/BLO.0b013e31814fb1bb
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
New techniques for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis ideally should improve union rate and reduce the complication rate. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the union rate of tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis achieved using an intramedullary nail without formal debridement of the subtalar joint and open or percutaneous debridement of the ankle joint. Consolidation time, complication and satisfaction rates, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score, and shoe adaptation were assessed. Fifty patients who had tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodeses with a minimum followup of 12 months (mean, 51 months; range, 12-84 months) were retrospectively reviewed. All patients completed a questionnaire and underwent physical examination and radiographic investigations. Fusion was achieved in all ankles; two subtalar joints did not fuse. The average time of fusion was 20 weeks for both joints. Observed complications were few and the satisfaction rate was 92%. The mean American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle/hindfoot score was 70. Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis with a specifically designed retrograde intramedullary nail without formal debridement of the subtalar joint and a choice between open or percutaneous debridement of the ankle is a reliable method to achieve fusion. Opening and debriding the subtalar joint is, in our opinion, not necessary, and percutaneous debridement of the ankle is a good alternative to open debridement. Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   ARTHRODESIS OF THE ANKLE JOINT - EXPERIENCES WITH THE TRANSFIBULAR APPROACH [J].
ADAMS, JC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1948, 30 (03) :506-511
[2]   Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and blade plate fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis [J].
Alfahd, UA ;
Roth, SE ;
Stephen, D ;
Whyne, CM .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2005, 19 (10) :703-708
[3]   TIBIOCALCANEAL ARTHRODESIS FOR NONBRACEABLE NEUROPATHIC ANKLE DEFORMITY [J].
ALVAREZ, RG ;
BARBOUR, TM ;
PERKINS, TD .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 15 (07) :354-359
[4]   Tibio-talocalcaneal arthrodesis as a primary procedure using a retrograde intramedullary nail -: A retrospective study of 26 patients with rheumatoid arthritis [J].
Anderson, T ;
Linder, L ;
Rydholm, U ;
Montgomery, F ;
Besjakov, J ;
Carlsson, Å .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2005, 76 (04) :580-587
[5]   A biomechanical comparison of intramedullary nail and crossed lag screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis [J].
Berend, ME ;
Glisson, RR ;
Nunley, JA .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 18 (10) :639-643
[6]   THE OPTIMUM POSITION OF ARTHRODESIS OF THE ANKLE - A GAIT STUDY OF THE KNEE AND ANKLE [J].
BUCK, P ;
MORREY, BF ;
CHAO, EYS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1987, 69A (07) :1052-1062
[7]  
CARRIER DA, 1991, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P10
[8]   Intramedullary rod fixation compared with blade-plate-and-screw fixation for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis: A biomechanical investigation [J].
Chiodo, CP ;
Acevedo, JI ;
Sammarco, VJ ;
Parks, BG ;
Boucher, HR ;
Myerson, MS ;
Schon, LC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 85A (12) :2425-2428
[9]   Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis [J].
Chou, LB ;
Mann, RA ;
Yaszay, B ;
Graves, SC ;
McPeake, WT ;
Dreeben, SM ;
Horton, GA ;
Katcherian, DA ;
Clanton, TO ;
Miller, RA ;
Van Manen, JW .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 21 (10) :804-808
[10]   Tibiotalocalcaneal (hindfoot) arthrodesis by retrograde intramedullary nailing using a curved locking nail. The results of 52 procedures [J].
Hammett, R ;
Hepple, S ;
Forster, B ;
Winson, I .
FOOT & ANKLE INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 26 (10) :810-815