The computational prediction of genotoxicity

被引:26
作者
Naven, Russell T. [1 ]
Louise-May, Shirley [1 ]
Greene, Nigel [1 ]
机构
[1] Pfizer Inc, Compound Safety Predict, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
ACD/Tox; chromosome damage; computational toxicology; Derek for Windows; mutagenicity; QSAR; SAR; INCORPORATING MOLECULAR FLEXIBILITY; GENETIC TOXICITY; STRUCTURAL REQUIREMENTS; CHROMOSOME-ABERRATIONS; RODENT CARCINOGENICITY; METABOLIC-ACTIVATION; ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; DRUG DEVELOPMENT; HIGH-THROUGHPUT; RISK-ASSESSMENT;
D O I
10.1517/17425255.2010.495118
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Importance of the field: The computational prediction of genotoxicity is important to the early identification of those chemical entities that have the potential to cause carcinogenicity in humans. Areas covered in this review: The review discusses key scientific developments in the prediction of Ames mutagenicity and in vitro chromosome damage over the past 4 - 5 years. The performance and limitations of computational approaches are discussed in relation to published and internal validation exercises. Their application to the modern drug discovery paradigm is also discussed. What the reader will gain: Key highlights of a review of the recent scientific literature for the prediction of Ames mutagenicity and chromosome damage and an appreciation of the factors that limit the predictive performance of in silico systems. Take home message: Current in silico systems perform well in the mutagenicity prediction of the publicly-derived data on which they are based, but their performance outside the applicability domain is considerably lower. We conclude that it is the lack of mechanistic structure-activity relationships and limited access to high quality proprietary data which are holding back computational genotoxicity from reaching higher predictive levels.
引用
收藏
页码:797 / 807
页数:11
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   DEFINITIVE RELATIONSHIPS AMONG CHEMICAL-STRUCTURE, CARCINOGENICITY AND MUTAGENICITY FOR 301 CHEMICALS TESTED BY THE UNITED-STATES NTP [J].
ASHBY, J ;
TENNANT, RW .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1991, 257 (03) :229-306
[2]   Bioluminescent Salmonella reverse mutation assay: a screen for detecting mutagenicity with high throughput attributes [J].
Aubrecht, Jiri ;
Osowski, Jeffery J. ;
Persaud, Prita ;
Cheung, Jennifer R. ;
Ackerman, Joel ;
Lopes, Sarah H. ;
Ku, Warren W. .
MUTAGENESIS, 2007, 22 (05) :335-342
[3]   Mechanisms of action of DNA intercalating acridine-based drugs: How important are contributions from electron transfer and oxidative stress? [J].
Baguley, BC ;
Wakelin, LPG ;
Jacintho, JD ;
Kovacic, P .
CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2003, 10 (24) :2643-2649
[4]  
BENIGNI R, 2010, MUTAGENESIS IN PRESS
[5]   Structure alerts for carcinogenicity, and the Salmonella assay system:: A novel insight through the chemical relational databases technology [J].
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Bossa, Cecilia .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2008, 659 (03) :248-261
[6]   Predictivity of QSAR [J].
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Bossa, Cecilia .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2008, 48 (05) :971-980
[7]   Predictivity and reliability of QSAR models: The case of mutagens and carcinogens [J].
Benigni, Romualdo ;
Bossa, Cecilia .
TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS, 2008, 18 (2-3) :137-147
[8]   An in Silico Method for Predicting Ames Activities of Primary Aromatic Amines by Calculating the Stabilities of Nitrenium Ions [J].
Bentzien, Joerg ;
Hickey, Eugene R. ;
Kemper, Raymond A. ;
Brewer, Mark L. ;
Dyekjaer, Jane D. ;
East, Stephen P. ;
Whittaker, Mark .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2010, 50 (02) :274-297
[9]   Carcinogenicity categorization of chemicals - new aspects to be considered in a European perspective [J].
Bolt, HM ;
Foth, H ;
Hengstler, JG ;
Degen, GH .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 151 (01) :29-41
[10]   Comparison of MC4PC and MDL-QSAR rodent carcinogenicity predictions and the enhancement of predictive performance by combining QSAR models [J].
Contrera, Joseph F. ;
Kruhlak, Naomi L. ;
Matthews, Edwin J. ;
Benz, R. Daniel .
REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2007, 49 (03) :172-182