Fire impact assessment in FLNG processing facilities using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

被引:45
作者
Baalisampang, Til [1 ]
Abbassi, Rouzbeh [1 ]
Garaniya, Vikram [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ,2 ]
Dadashzadeh, Mohammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, AMC, Natl Ctr Maritime Engn & Hydrodynam, Launceston, Tas, Australia
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Ctr Risk Integr & Safety Engn, St John, NF, Canada
[3] Ulster Univ, Sch Built Environm, Res Inst, Jordanstown Campus, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
CFD; Fire modelling; Accident credibility; Hazard assessment; FLNG; CREDIBLE ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ASSESSMENT; HAZARD ANALYSIS; LNG; SIMULATION; EXPLOSION; RADIATION; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.05.012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Increasing demand for natural gas has pushed the exploration of natural gas to remote offshore locations using a Floating LNG (FLNG) facility. In this facility, fire hazards are comparatively high and even a single fire accident may be catastrophic due to the congested and complex layout of the facility. This study proposes a novel methodology for modelling the impact of a fire event in an FLNG facility. Hazard identification and accident credibility assessment have been used to discover the three most credible fire accident scenarios. These scenarios have been simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). The results have then been compared to identify the most severe impact of the fire on personnel and assets using thermal radiation and risk levels. It has been found that the fire event in all three scenarios has a high potential to cause damage to adjacent assets. From this comparison, it is evident that the scenario in the Mixed Refrigerant Module in the liquefaction process has the highest risk of fire to both on-board personnel and assets. The proposed methodology may be adopted further for safety measure design to mitigate or avoid the impacts of a fire event in any complex processing facility.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 52
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[31]   Multivariate hazard identification and ranking system [J].
Khan, FI ;
Abbasi, SA .
PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 1998, 17 (03) :157-170
[32]   A criterion for developing credible accident scenarios for risk assessment [J].
Khan, FI ;
Abbasi, SA .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2002, 15 (06) :467-475
[33]   Risk-based process safety assessment and control measures design for offshore process facilities [J].
Khan, FI ;
Sadiq, R ;
Husain, T .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2002, 94 (01) :1-36
[34]  
Khan FI, 2001, CHEM ENG PROG, V97, P56
[35]   Heat flow analysis of an FPSO topside model with wind effect taken into account: A wind-tunnel test and CFD simulation [J].
Kim, B. J. ;
Yoon, J. Y. ;
Yu, G. C. ;
Ryu, H. S. ;
Ha, Y. C. ;
Paik, J. K. .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2011, 38 (10) :1130-1140
[36]   Risk assessment of membrane type LNG storage tanks in Korea-based on fault tree analysis [J].
Kim, H ;
Koh, JS ;
Kim, Y ;
Theofanous, TG .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 22 (01) :1-8
[37]  
Kjellen U., 2000, PREVENTION ACCIDENTS, V1st
[38]  
Kletz T., 2001, LEARNING ACCIDENTS, V3rd
[39]  
Koo J., 2009, SAFETY ASSESSMENT LN
[40]   A practical approach to fire hazard analysis for offshore structures [J].
Krueger, J ;
Smith, D .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2003, 104 (1-3) :107-122