Fire impact assessment in FLNG processing facilities using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

被引:45
作者
Baalisampang, Til [1 ]
Abbassi, Rouzbeh [1 ]
Garaniya, Vikram [1 ]
Khan, Faisal [1 ,2 ]
Dadashzadeh, Mohammad [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tasmania, AMC, Natl Ctr Maritime Engn & Hydrodynam, Launceston, Tas, Australia
[2] Mem Univ Newfoundland, Fac Engn & Appl Sci, Ctr Risk Integr & Safety Engn, St John, NF, Canada
[3] Ulster Univ, Sch Built Environm, Res Inst, Jordanstown Campus, Coleraine, Londonderry, North Ireland
关键词
CFD; Fire modelling; Accident credibility; Hazard assessment; FLNG; CREDIBLE ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SAFETY ASSESSMENT; HAZARD ANALYSIS; LNG; SIMULATION; EXPLOSION; RADIATION; DESIGN; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.05.012
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Increasing demand for natural gas has pushed the exploration of natural gas to remote offshore locations using a Floating LNG (FLNG) facility. In this facility, fire hazards are comparatively high and even a single fire accident may be catastrophic due to the congested and complex layout of the facility. This study proposes a novel methodology for modelling the impact of a fire event in an FLNG facility. Hazard identification and accident credibility assessment have been used to discover the three most credible fire accident scenarios. These scenarios have been simulated using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code, Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS). The results have then been compared to identify the most severe impact of the fire on personnel and assets using thermal radiation and risk levels. It has been found that the fire event in all three scenarios has a high potential to cause damage to adjacent assets. From this comparison, it is evident that the scenario in the Mixed Refrigerant Module in the liquefaction process has the highest risk of fire to both on-board personnel and assets. The proposed methodology may be adopted further for safety measure design to mitigate or avoid the impacts of a fire event in any complex processing facility.
引用
收藏
页码:42 / 52
页数:11
相关论文
共 85 条
[21]   An integrated approach for fire and explosion consequence modelling [J].
Dadashzadeh, Mohammad ;
Khan, Faisal ;
Hawboldt, Kelly ;
Amyotte, Paul .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2013, 61 :324-337
[22]   Quantitative risk analysis of fire and explosion on the top-side LNG-liquefaction process of LNG-FPSO [J].
Dan, Seungkyu ;
Lee, Chang Jun ;
Park, Jeongpil ;
Shin, Dongil ;
Yoon, En Sup .
PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2014, 92 (05) :430-441
[23]   Jet fires and the domino effect [J].
Gomez-Mares, Mercedes ;
Zarate, Luis ;
Casal, Joaquim .
FIRE SAFETY JOURNAL, 2008, 43 (08) :583-588
[24]  
Hightower M., 2004, GUIDANCE RISK ANAL S
[25]  
HSE, METH APPR DET HUM VU
[26]   CFD modeling and fire damage analysis of jet fire on hydrogen pipeline in a pipe rack structure [J].
Jang, Chang Bong ;
Choi, Sang-Won ;
Baek, Jong-Bae .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2015, 40 (45) :15760-15772
[27]  
Jeanes D., 1984, TECHNICAL REPORT 84
[28]  
Jeanes D., 1980, METHODS CALCULATING
[29]   LNG pool fire simulation for domino effect analysis [J].
Jujuly, Muhammad Masum ;
Rahman, Aziz ;
Ahmed, Salim ;
Khan, Faisal .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 143 :19-29
[30]  
Kerbers I., 2008, BREAKTHROUGH FLOATIN