An item response theory analysis of the PTSD checklist for DSM-5: Implications for DSM-5 and ICD-11

被引:17
作者
Silverstein, Madison W. [1 ]
Petri, Jessica M. [2 ]
Kramer, Lindsay B. [2 ]
Weathers, Frank W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Loyola Univ, Dept Psychol Sci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Dept Psychol, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
Item response theory; Posttraumatic stress disorder; PCL-5; DSM-5; ICD-11; POSTTRAUMATIC-STRESS-DISORDER; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURE; SYMPTOMS; MILITARY; CRITERIA; VETERANS; BEHAVIOR; SPANISH;
D O I
10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102190
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The PTSD Checklist (PCL) is a widely used, extensively validated questionnaire for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The PCL was revised for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th Edition (DSM-5; Friedman, 2013), and the updated version, the PCL-5, has continued the strong psychometric performance of the original version. To further explore the PCL-5's psychometric properties, we used item response theory (IRT) to examine item difficulty and discrimination parameters in separate samples of trauma-exposed undergraduates (N = 1213) and community members (N = 367). Considering item difficulty, nightmares, flashbacks, and reckless or self-destructive behavior emerged among the most difficult items across samples and internal avoidance emerged as the least difficult items across samples. In terms of item discrimination, inability to experience positive emotions, detachment from others, diminished interest, and negative emotions emerged as highly discriminating items in both samples, and traumatic amnesia and reckless or self-destructive behavior emerged as the least discriminating items in both samples. These results have implications for the divergent conceptualizations of PTSD in DSM-5 versus International Classification of Diseases, 11th Edition (ICD-11; WHO, 2018). Future research should employ IRT in a clinical population.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] American Psychiatric Association, 2013, Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425596
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2018, ICD-11, International Classification of Diseases, V11th
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, V1
  • [4] A network analysis of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms and correlates in US military veterans
    Armour, Cherie
    Fried, Eiko I.
    Deserno, Marie K.
    Tsai, Jack
    Pietrzak, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2017, 45 : 49 - 59
  • [5] A systematic literature review of PTSD's latent structure in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-IV to DSM-5
    Armour, Cherie
    Mullerova, Jana
    Elhai, Jon D.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2016, 44 : 60 - 74
  • [6] Dimensional structure of DSM-5 posttraumatic stress symptoms: Support for a hybrid Anhedonia and Externalizing Behaviors model
    Armour, Cherie
    Tsai, Jack
    Durham, Tory A.
    Charak, Ruby
    Biehn, Tracey L.
    Elhai, Jon D.
    Pietrzak, Robert H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2015, 61 : 106 - 113
  • [7] Betemps Elizabeth, 2004, Ment Health Serv Res, V6, P117, DOI 10.1023/B:MHSR.0000024355.38667.e5
  • [8] Betemps Elizabeth J, 2003, J Appl Meas, V4, P59
  • [9] The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation
    Blevins, Christy A.
    Weathers, Frank W.
    Davis, Margaret T.
    Witte, Tracy K.
    Domino, Jessica L.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMATIC STRESS, 2015, 28 (06) : 489 - 498
  • [10] Validating the primary care posttraumatic stress disorder screen and the posttraumatic stress disorder checklist with soldiers returning from combat
    Bliese, Paul D.
    Wright, Kathleen M.
    Adler, Amy B.
    Cabrera, Oscar
    Castro, Carl A.
    Hoge, Charles W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 76 (02) : 272 - 281