Multi-market demand response from pump-controlled open canal systems: an economic MPC approach to pump-scheduling

被引:2
作者
van der Heijden, Ties [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lugt, Dorien [3 ]
van Nooijen, Ronald [1 ]
Palensky, Peter [2 ]
Abraham, Edo [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Civil Engn & Geosci, Dept Water Management, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Fac Elect Engn Math & Comp Sci, Elect Sustainable Energy Dept, Mekelweg 4, NL-2628 CD Delft, Netherlands
[3] HKV Consultants, Informat Laan 8, NL-2628 ZD Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Demand Response; electricity markets; open canal systems; pump-scheduling; water resource management; MODEL-PREDICTIVE CONTROL; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; POWER-SYSTEMS; OPTIMIZATION; REANALYSIS; PROVISION;
D O I
10.2166/hydro.2022.018
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Participation in demand response (DR) has been explored for many large energy-using assets based on day ahead electricity markets. In this manuscript, we propose the use of multiple electricity spot markets to enable price-based DR for open canal systems in the Netherlands, where many large pumping stations are used for flood mitigation and control of groundwater levels. In the new strategy for pump-scheduling, we combine the day ahead and intraday electricity markets to be used in a hierarchical receding horizon economic Model Predictive Control (MPC). We formulate the decision problem as a Mixed-Integer Quadratic Problem (MIQP), to be solved to near global optimality. A cost-potential analysis was performed for multiple market strategies and the automatic Frequency Restoration Reserves (aFRRs), using actual market and water system data. We show new insights into the trade-off between CO2 emissions and operating cost, the difference between the German and Dutch markets, and temporal changes in market conditions due to renewable energy integration. We observe that the German energy market is rewarding DR more than the Dutch equivalent, due to the higher renewable energy market penetration. The proposed multi-market strategy leads to a cost decrease of 10 and 16% in the Netherlands in 2017 and 2019, respectively. When applying German market scenarios, we found a cost-saving potential of 56 and 50% in 2017 and 2019, respectively. The cost-saving potential for the aFRR market was found to be up to 12% in the Netherlands and 28% in Germany, through a conservative analysis. The results suggest that the proposed control system, optimising costs over the day ahead, intraday and possibly the aFRR markets, is profitable compared to the current strategy in both the current and future electricity market.
引用
收藏
页码:838 / 855
页数:18
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
Bertoldi P., 2016, Demand Response status in EU Member States
[2]   Demand-response in building heating systems: A Model Predictive Control approach [J].
Bianchini, Gianni ;
Casini, Marco ;
Vicino, Antonio ;
Zarrilli, Donato .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 168 :159-170
[3]   Life cycle assessment of onshore and offshore wind energy-from theory to application [J].
Bonou, Alexandra ;
Laurent, Alexis ;
Olsen, Stig I. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 180 :327-337
[4]  
Centraal Bureau van de Statistiek, 2019, STATLINE ELEKTRICITE
[5]  
De Jong J., 2017, Improving the market for flexibility in the electricity sector
[6]  
ENTSO-E, 2018, ENTSO E TRANSP PLATF
[7]  
European Commission, 2016, 2050 LOW CARB EC ROA
[8]  
European Commission, 2016, DEM RESP EU MEMB STA
[9]  
Fraunhofer Institute for solar energy systems ISE, 2019, NET PUBL EL GEN GERM
[10]  
Geerse C.P.M., 2015, TECH REP HKV