Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife: An anatomical study

被引:7
|
作者
Qiu, Zuyun [1 ]
Li, Hui [2 ]
Shen, Yifeng [3 ]
Jia, Yan [2 ]
Sun, Xiaojie [2 ]
Zhou, Qiaoyin [4 ]
Li, Shiliang [2 ]
Zhang, Weiguang [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jishuitan Hosp, Dept Tradit Chinese Med Bone Setting, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Japan Friendship Hosp, Dept Acupuncture & Moxibust, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Hosp Chengdu Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Dept Tradit Chinese Surg, Chengdu, Peoples R China
[4] Fujian Univ Tradit Chinese Med, Chinese Med Coll, Fuzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Peking Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Dept Human Anat, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN SURGERY | 2022年 / 9卷
关键词
stenosing flexor tenosynovitis; needle-knife; anatomy; percutaneous release; ultrasound-guided technique; a1; pulley; trigger finger; TRIGGER-FINGER;
D O I
10.3389/fsurg.2022.967400
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The present study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife.Methods: The author performed percutaneous A1 pulley release in 84 cadaveric hands fixed with 10% formalin. The cadaveric hands were divided into three groups: 28 hands in each group (group U: ultrasound-guided needle knife pushing group, group N: non-ultrasound-guided needle knife pushing group, group T: classical needle knife operation puncture group). Percutaneous A1 pulley release was performed, the soft tissue was dissected layer by layer, and the relevant anatomical data were measured.Results: The injured cases were as follows: group U, 29 (20.7%); group N, 36 (25.7%); and group T, 28 (20.0%). There is no significant difference between different tissue injury types in different intervention methods. The missed release cases were as follows: group U, 8 (5.7%); group N, 4 (2.9%); and group T, 13 (9.3%). The percentage of released A1 pulley were as follows: group U, 71.4%+/- 30.7%; group N, 66.0%+/- 20.3%; and group T, 61.0%+/- 30.4%. The percentage of released A1 pulley of the three groups were compared: group U > group N > group T, and there was statistical difference between the three groups. The full release rates of the three groups were compared: group U(31.4%) > group N(15.7%) > group T(13.6%), and there were significant difference in the full release of A1 pulley between group U and group T, group N.Conclusion: Based on the cadaver specimen, the length and percentage of released A1 pulley is longer by ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle-knife. and there was no statistical difference in the injury rate between the three techniques.Type of Study and Clinical Relevance: Clinical anatomic study. To test the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife in cadaveric hands, and provide an anatomically based support in clinic.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Release of A1 Pulley by Using a Needle Knife: A Prospective Study of 41 Cases
    Pan, Min
    Sheng, Shuya
    Fan, Zhiqi
    Lu, Hao
    Yang, Hong
    Yan, Fei
    E, Zhansen
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [2] Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release by Acupotomy (Needle-Knife): A Cadaveric Study of Safety and Efficacy
    Yang, Jiaxuan
    Ma, Bin
    Zhong, Hao
    Zhang, Yue
    Zhu, Jiang
    Ni, Yong
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2022, 15 : 413 - 422
  • [3] Ultrasound-guided thread versus ultrasound-guided needle release of the A1 pulley: a cadaveric study
    Jengojan, Suren
    Sorgo, Philipp
    Streicher, Johannes
    Snoj, Ziga
    Kasprian, Gregor
    Gruber, Gerlinde
    Bodner, Gerd
    RADIOLOGIA MEDICA, 2024, 129 (10): : 1513 - 1521
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous flexor retinaculum release of the ankle: an anatomical study
    Sun, Xiaojie
    Shi, Rongxing
    Shen, Yifeng
    Qiu, Zuyun
    Jia, Yan
    Zhou, Qiaoyin
    Shi, Chong
    Li, Yunnan
    Zhang, Weiguang
    Li, Shiliang
    Chen, Zhaojun
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2024, 14 (06) : 3875 - 3886
  • [5] Ultrasound-Guided A1 Pulley Release A Systematic Review
    Nakagawa, Hirotaka
    Redmond, Travis
    Colberg, Ricardo
    Latzka, Erek
    White, Mia S.
    Bowers, Robert L.
    Sussman, Walter I.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (11) : 2491 - 2499
  • [6] A1 pulley cutting potential and safety of three ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release techniques for trigger finger: a cadaveric study
    de la Fuente, Javier
    Blasi, Marc
    Davila, Fernando
    Ribera, Angels
    Sala-Blanch, Xavier
    Balius, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2025, 20 (01):
  • [7] Ultrasound-guided needle release of A1 pulley combined with corticosteroid injection is more effective than ultrasound-guided needle release alone in the treatment of trigger finger
    Wu, Yan-Yan
    Chen, Kai
    He, Fan-Ding
    Quan, Jie-Rong
    Guo, Xuan-Yan
    BMC SURGERY, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [8] Sonographically Guided Percutaneous First Annular Pulley Release Cadaveric Safety Study of Needle and Knife Techniques
    Smith, Jay
    Rizzo, Marco
    Lai, Jim K.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (11) : 1531 - 1542
  • [9] Treatment of Trigger finger by ultrasound-guided needle release of a1 pulley: A series of 105 cases
    Chopin, Clement
    Le Guillou, Adrien
    Salmon, Jean Hugues
    Lellouche, Henri
    Richette, Pascal
    Maillet, Jeremy
    JOINT BONE SPINE, 2022, 89 (06)
  • [10] Ultrasound-guided percutaneous release of the annular pulley in trigger digit
    Rajeswaran, Gajan
    Lee, Justin C.
    Eckersley, Rupert
    Katsarma, Effie
    Healy, Jeremiah C.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (09) : 2232 - 2237