Optimal imaging modality for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:43
作者
Gerges, B. [1 ,2 ]
Li, W. [3 ]
Leonardi, M. [1 ,4 ]
Mol, B. W. [3 ,5 ]
Condous, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney Nepean Hosp, Sydney Med Sch Nepean, Kingswood, NSW, Australia
[2] Blacktown Hosp, Sydney West Adv Pelv Surg Swaps, Blacktown, NSW, Australia
[3] Monash Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[4] McMaster Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Aberdeen, Aberdeen Ctr Womens Hlth Res, Aberdeen, Scotland
关键词
bowel; computed tomography; diagnosis; endometriosis; imaging; laparoscopy; magnetic resonance imaging; preoperative; rectal; rectal endoscopic sonography; rectosigmoid; transvaginal sonography; INFILTRATING ENDOMETRIOSIS; TRANSVAGINAL SONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PELVIC ENDOMETRIOSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; ULTRASOUND; WOMEN; COLONOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1002/uog.23148
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objectives To review the accuracy of different imaging modalities for the detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis (DE) in women with clinical suspicion of endometriosis, and to determine the optimal modality. Methods A search was conducted using PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE and Google Scholar to identify studies using imaging to evaluate women with suspected DE, published from inception to May 2020. Studies were considered eligible if they were prospective and used any imaging modality to assess preoperatively for the presence of DE in the rectum/rectosigmoid, which was then correlated with the surgical diagnosis as the reference standard. Eligibility was restricted to studies including at least 10 affected and 10 unaffected women. The QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Mixed-effects diagnostic meta-analysis was used to determine the overall pooled sensitivity and specificity of each imaging modality for rectal/rectosigmoid DE, which were used to calculate the likelihood ratio of a positive (LR+) and negative (LR-) test and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR). Results Of the 1979 records identified, 30 studies (3374 women) were included in the analysis. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity, LR+, LR- and DOR for the detection of rectal/rectosigmoid DE using transvaginal sonography (TVS) were, respectively, 89% (95% CI, 83-92%), 97% (95% CI, 95-98%), 30.8 (95% CI, 17.6-54.1), 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08-0.17) and 264 (95% CI, 113-614). For magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the respective values were 86% (95% CI, 79- 91%), 96% (95% CI, 94-97%), 21.0 (95% CI, 13.4-33.1), 0.15 (95% CI, 0.09-0.23) and 144 (95% CI, 70-297). For computed tomography, the respective values were 93% (95% CI, 84-97%), 95% (95% CI, 81-99%), 20.3 (95% CI, 4.3-94.9), 0.07 (95% CI, 0.03-0.19) and 280 (95% CI, 28-2826). For rectal endoscopic sonography (RES), the respective values were 92% (95% CI, 87- 95%), 98% (95% CI, 96-99%), 37.1 (95% CI, 21.1-65.4), 0.08 (95% CI, 0.05-0.14) and 455 (95% CI, 196-1054). There was significant heterogeneity and the studies were considered methodologically poor according to the QUADAS-2 tool. Conclusions The sensitivity of TVS for the detection of rectal/rectosigmoid DE seems to be slightly better than that of MRI, although RES was superior to both. The specificity of both TVS and MRI was excellent. As TVS is simpler, faster and more readily available than the other methods, we believe that it should be the first-line diagnostic tool for women with suspected DE. (C) 2020 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
引用
收藏
页码:190 / 200
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
  • [1] Double-contrast barium enema and transrectal endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intestinal deeply infiltrating endometriosis
    Abdalla Ayroza Ribeiro, Helizabet Salomao
    Ribeiro, Paulo Ayroza
    Rossini, Lucio
    Rodrigues, Francisco Cesar
    Donadio, Nilson
    Aoki, Tsutomu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 15 (03) : 315 - 320
  • [2] Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis
    Abrao, Mauricio S.
    Goncalves, Manoel Orlando da C.
    Dias, Joao Antonio, Jr.
    Podgaec, Sergio
    Chamie, Luciana P.
    Blasbalg, Roberto
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2007, 22 (12) : 3092 - 3097
  • [3] Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal, and transrectal ultrasonography in deep infiltrating endometriosis
    Alborzi, Saeed
    Rasekhi, Alireza
    Shomali, Zahra
    Madadi, Gooya
    Alborzi, Mahshid
    Kazemi, Mahboobeh
    Nohandani, Azam Hosseini
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2018, 97 (08)
  • [4] The Role of Computed Tomography Colonography in Detecting Bowel Involvement in Women With Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis: Comparison With Clinical History, Serum Ca125, and Transvaginal Sonography
    Baggio, Silvia
    Zecchin, Alessandro
    Pomini, Paola
    Zanconato, Giovanni
    Genna, Michele
    Motton, Massimiliano
    Montemezzi, Stefania
    Franchi, Massimo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (06) : 886 - 891
  • [5] Endorectal ultrasonography in predicting rectal wall infiltration in patients with deep pelvic endometriosis:: A modern tool for an ancient disease
    Bahr, Abbas
    de Parades, Vincent
    Gadonneix, Pierre
    Etienney, Isabelle
    Salet-Lizee, Delphine
    Villet, Richard
    Atienza, Patrick
    [J]. DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2006, 49 (06) : 869 - 875
  • [6] A Prospective Study Comparing Three-Dimensional Rectal Water Contrast Transvaginal Ultrasonography and Computed Tomographic Colonography in the Diagnosis of Rectosigmoid Endometriosis
    Barra, Fabio
    Biscaldi, Ennio
    Scala, Carolina
    Lagana, Antonio Simone
    Vellone, Valerio Gaetano
    Stabilini, Cesare
    Ghezzi, Fabio
    Ferrero, Simone
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (04)
  • [7] Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis
    Bazot, M.
    Malzy, P.
    Cortez, A.
    Roseau, G.
    Amouyal, P.
    Darai, E.
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 30 (07) : 994 - 1001
  • [8] Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis
    Bazot, M
    Thomassin, I
    Hourani, R
    Cortez, A
    Darai, E
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 24 (02) : 180 - 185
  • [9] Comparison of 3D and 2D FSE T2-weighted MRI in the diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: Preliminary results
    Bazot, M.
    Stivalet, A.
    Darai, E.
    Coudray, C.
    Thomassin-Naggara, I.
    Poncelet, E.
    [J]. CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2013, 68 (01) : 47 - 54
  • [10] Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination, transvaginal sonography, rectal endoscopic sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose deep infiltrating endometriosis
    Bazot, Marc
    Lafont, Clarisse
    Rouzier, Roman
    Roseau, Gilles
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Darai, Emile
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2009, 92 (06) : 1825 - 1833