Logics of business education for sustainability

被引:15
作者
Andersson, Pernilla [1 ]
Ohman, Johan [2 ]
机构
[1] Sodertorn Univ, Environm Studies, Huddinge, Sweden
[2] Univ Orebro, Sch Humanities Educ & Social Sci, SE-70182 Orebro, Sweden
关键词
business education; ethics; education for sustainable development; subject position; logics;
D O I
10.1080/13504622.2015.1015493
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This paper explores various kinds of logics of business education for sustainability' and how these logics' position the subject business person, based on eight teachers' reasoning of their own practices. The concept of logics developed within a discourse theoretical framework is employed to analyse the teachers' reasoning. The analysis takes its starting point in different approaches to how a business ought to or could take responsibility for sustainable development. Different approaches to business ethical responsibilities, in combination with assumptions about how educational content is legitimised and presupposed purposes of education, are used to construct logics of business education for sustainability. In the paper, the results of this analysis are presented as: the logic of profit-, social- or radical-oriented business education. Our results also show how the different logics position the subject business person differently, as one who adapts to, adds or creates ethical values. The results are first discussed in terms of how environmental and social challenges could be dealt with in the future and secondly, considering the risk of de-subjectification with regard to profit-oriented business education, the implications this may have for the educational quality itself.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 479
页数:17
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Globalisation and education for sustainable development: emancipation from context and meaning [J].
Bengtsson, Stefan L. ;
Ostman, Leif O. .
ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2013, 19 (04) :477-498
[2]   Good education in an age of measurement: on the need to reconnect with the question of purpose in education [J].
Biesta, Gert .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :33-46
[3]  
Carroll A.B., 1991, Bus Horiz, V34, P39, DOI DOI 10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G
[4]  
Dryzek J.S., 2013, POLITICS EARTH ENV D
[5]  
Friedman M., 2002, CAPITALISM FREEDOM
[6]  
Glynos J, 2007, ROUTL INNOV POLIT TH, V26, P1
[7]  
Glynos J., 2008, 1 IDA WORLD C ROSK U
[8]  
Granovetter MarkS., 1992, SOCIOLOGY EC LIFE
[9]  
Howarth David., 2000, Discourse (Concepts in the Social Sciences)
[10]  
Hudson B., 2011, Beyond fragmentation. Didactics