Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:16
作者
Lv, Yan [1 ]
Zou, Zui [3 ]
Chen, Guan-min [4 ]
Jia, Huai-Xin [2 ]
Zhong, Jing [1 ]
Fang, Wei-Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] Mil Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Beijing, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
amlodipine; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; antihypertensive agents; CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; DOUBLE-BLIND; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; PUBLICATION BIAS; ACTIVE TREATMENT; THERAPY; BENAZEPRIL; PLACEBO; NIFEDIPINE;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833a23d4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as compared with amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random effect model of meta-analysis was used for the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 3291 patients were identified using predefined criteria. The combination treatment of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors resulted in a greater reduction of both systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) 5.72, 95% CI: (confidence interval) 4.10-7.33] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD 3.62, 95% CI: 4.85-2.39) than monotherapy. The combination treatment also generated significantly greater reductions for the mean ambulatory SBP and DBP during the full 24 hours (WMD: SBP 4.24, 95% CI: 6.82-1.67; DBP 2.23, 95% CI: 3.73-0.69), but not for the trough (WMD: SBP 4.52, 9.56 to -0.51; DBP 3.7, 7.65 to -0.25). The hypertension therapeutic control (SPB < 140, DBP < 90 mmHg) rate for the combination treatment is higher than that for monotherapy [relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.73]. The combination treatment also resulted in a lower overall rate of adverse events (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.99) and edema (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.29-0.56), but a higher rate of cough (RR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.03-5.29) as compared with monotherapy. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that the combination treatment provides superior BP control, fewer adverse events, and better tolerability in hypertensive patients than monotherapy. Further research should explore the mechanism of the combination therapy and whether it is associated with the reduction of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Blood Press Monit 15: 195-204 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 204
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[31]   Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension [J].
Jamerson, KA ;
Nwose, O ;
Jean-Louis, L ;
Schofield, L ;
Purkayastha, D ;
Baron, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (06) :495-501
[32]   Fifty years of Framingham Study contributions to understanding hypertension [J].
Kannel, WB .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2000, 14 (02) :83-90
[33]  
Kearney PM, 2005, LANCET, V365, P217, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70151-3
[34]   A CLINICAL-TRIAL OF THE ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING-ENZYME INHIBITOR TRANDOLAPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH LEFT-VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION AFTER MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
KOBER, L ;
TORPPEDERSEN, C ;
CARLSEN, JE ;
BAGGER, H ;
ELIASEN, P ;
LYNGBORG, K ;
VIDEBEK, J ;
COLE, DS ;
AUCLERT, L ;
PAULY, NC ;
ALIOT, E ;
PERSSON, S ;
CAMM, AJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 333 (25) :1670-1676
[35]  
Kohlmann Junior O, 1999, Arq Bras Cardiol, V72, P547
[36]   Treatment of patients with essential hypertension: Amlodipine 5 mg benazepril 20 mg compared with amlodipine 5 mg, benazepril 20 mg, and placebo [J].
Kuschnir, E ;
Acuna, E ;
Sevilla, D ;
Vasquez, J ;
Bendersky, M ;
Resk, J ;
Glazer, R .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 1996, 18 (06) :1213-1224
[37]   Valsartan treatment of hypertension - does VALUE add value? [J].
Lindholm, LH .
LANCET, 2004, 363 (9426) :2010-2011
[38]   Comparison of active treatment and placebo in older Chinese patients with isolated systolic hypertension [J].
Liu, LS ;
Wang, JG ;
Gong, LS ;
Liu, GZ ;
Staessen, JA .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1998, 16 (12) :1823-1829
[39]   Antihypertensive medication prescription patterns and time trends for newly-diagnosed uncomplicated hypertension patients in Taiwan [J].
Liu P.-H. ;
Wang J.-D. .
BMC Health Services Research, 8 (1)
[40]   A prospective open-label randomised trial of quinapril and/or amlodipine in progressive non-diabetic renal failure [J].
MacGregor, MS ;
Deighan, CJ ;
Rodger, RSC ;
Boulton-Jones, JM .
NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 101 (03) :139-149