Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:16
作者
Lv, Yan [1 ]
Zou, Zui [3 ]
Chen, Guan-min [4 ]
Jia, Huai-Xin [2 ]
Zhong, Jing [1 ]
Fang, Wei-Wu [1 ]
机构
[1] Mil Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Hosp Beijing, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
amlodipine; angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors; antihypertensive agents; CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKER; BLOOD-PRESSURE CONTROL; DOUBLE-BLIND; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; PUBLICATION BIAS; ACTIVE TREATMENT; THERAPY; BENAZEPRIL; PLACEBO; NIFEDIPINE;
D O I
10.1097/MBP.0b013e32833a23d4
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to estimate the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors as compared with amlodipine monotherapy in the treatment of hypertension. Methods The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, and Embase were searched for relevant articles. A random effect model of meta-analysis was used for the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Results A total of 17 randomized controlled trials involving 3291 patients were identified using predefined criteria. The combination treatment of amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors resulted in a greater reduction of both systolic blood pressure (SBP) [weighted mean difference (WMD) 5.72, 95% CI: (confidence interval) 4.10-7.33] and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (WMD 3.62, 95% CI: 4.85-2.39) than monotherapy. The combination treatment also generated significantly greater reductions for the mean ambulatory SBP and DBP during the full 24 hours (WMD: SBP 4.24, 95% CI: 6.82-1.67; DBP 2.23, 95% CI: 3.73-0.69), but not for the trough (WMD: SBP 4.52, 9.56 to -0.51; DBP 3.7, 7.65 to -0.25). The hypertension therapeutic control (SPB < 140, DBP < 90 mmHg) rate for the combination treatment is higher than that for monotherapy [relative risk (RR): 1.36, 95% CI: 1.07-1.73]. The combination treatment also resulted in a lower overall rate of adverse events (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.75-0.99) and edema (RR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.29-0.56), but a higher rate of cough (RR: 3.28, 95% CI: 2.03-5.29) as compared with monotherapy. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that the combination treatment provides superior BP control, fewer adverse events, and better tolerability in hypertensive patients than monotherapy. Further research should explore the mechanism of the combination therapy and whether it is associated with the reduction of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Blood Press Monit 15: 195-204 (C) 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:195 / 204
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   THE EFFECT OF THE ANGIOTENSIN-CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITOR ZOFENOPRIL ON MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY AFTER ANTERIOR MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION [J].
AMBROSIONI, E ;
BORGHI, C ;
MAGNANI, B .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (02) :80-85
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1992, NEW ENGL J MED, V327, P685, DOI [10.1056/NEJM199209033271003.Erratumin, DOI 10.1056/NEJM199209033271003]
[3]  
Antihypertensive T., 2002, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V288, P2981, DOI [10.1001/jama.288.23.2981, DOI 10.1001/JAMA.288.23.2981]
[4]   OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS OF A BANK CORRELATION TEST FOR PUBLICATION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MAZUMDAR, M .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (04) :1088-1101
[5]   Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT) [J].
Brown, MJ ;
Palmer, CR ;
Castaigne, A ;
de Leeuw, PW ;
Mancia, G ;
Rosenthal, T ;
Ruilope, LM .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :366-372
[6]   ALPHA-BLOCKADE AND CALCIUM ANTAGONISM - AN EFFECTIVE AND WELL-TOLERATED COMBINATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF RESISTANT HYPERTENSION [J].
BROWN, MJ ;
DICKERSON, JEC .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1995, 13 (06) :701-707
[7]   AMLODIPINE AND LISINOPRIL IN COMBINATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION - EFFICACY AND PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE [J].
CAPPUCCIO, FP ;
MARKANDU, ND ;
SINGER, DRJ ;
MACGREGOR, GA .
JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 1993, 11 (08) :839-847
[8]   Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[9]   Clinical utility of long-term enalapril diltiazem ER in stage 3-4 essential hypertension [J].
Chrysant, SG ;
Gavras, H ;
Niederman, AL ;
Marbury, TC ;
Goldstein, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1997, 37 (09) :810-815
[10]   The effects of high-dose amlodipine/benazepril combination therapies on blood pressure reduction in patients not adequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy [J].
Chrysant, Steven G. ;
Sugimoto, Daniel H. ;
Lefkowitz, Marty ;
Salko, Thomas ;
Khan, Mahmudul ;
Arora, Vipin ;
Shi, Victor .
BLOOD PRESSURE, 2007, 16 :10-17