Poor standard mp-MRI and routine biopsy fail to precisely predict intraprostatic tumor localization

被引:4
作者
Billing, Andrea [1 ]
Buchner, Alexander [1 ]
Stief, Christian [1 ]
Roosen, Alexander [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Dept Urol, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany
关键词
Prostate cancer; Multiparametric MRI; Transrectal biopsy; Localization accuracy; Radical retropubic prostatectomy; SIGNIFICANT PROSTATE-CANCER; ENDORECTAL COIL; FOCAL THERAPY; SCORING SYSTEM; GUIDED BIOPSY; T; TRANSPERINEAL; VALIDATION; ACCURACY; COHORT;
D O I
10.1007/s00345-016-1776-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
To evaluate the localization accuracy of routinely performed preoperative multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI), not being assessed according to PI-RADS criteria. One hundred and six patients underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (January 2011-June 2012) with preoperative MRI. Intraprostatic tumor localization suggested by mp-MRI was correlated to both biopsy and histopathology results. Sensitivity and specificity were as low as 25-62 and 60-94 %, respectively. Neither higher field force nor the use of an endorectal coil could enhance accuracy. There was no statistically significant concordance in any sextant. The mean number of correctly identified sextants was between 3.11 and 4.00 and, thus, insignificantly above the value of 3 that one would obtain by tossing the coin. For transrectal biopsies, sensitivity and specificity of tumor localization were 52-63 and 46-80 %, respectively. Neither routinely performed "non-PI-RADS" MRI nor transrectal biopsy can accurately localize prostate cancer. Focal therapy concepts rely on a precise intraprostatic tumor detection and therefore inevitably require PI-RADS assessment by radiologists with genitourinary specialization. Regarding patient discomfort and costs, "non-PI-RADS" MRIs of the prostate are not justified.
引用
收藏
页码:1383 / 1388
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Validation Cohort Study with Transperineal Template Prostate Mapping as the Reference Standard [J].
Arumainayagam, Nimalan ;
Ahmed, Hashim U. ;
Moore, Caroline M. ;
Freeman, Alex ;
Allen, Clare ;
Sohaib, S. Aslam ;
Kirkham, Alex ;
van der Meulen, Jan ;
Emberton, Mark .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 268 (03) :761-769
[2]   Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Significant Prostate Cancer with High Probability [J].
Bains, Lauren J. ;
Studer, Urs E. ;
Froehlich, Johannes M. ;
Giannarini, Gianluca ;
Triantafyllou, Maria ;
Fleischmann, Achim ;
Thoenyt, Harriet C. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (03) :737-742
[3]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[4]   Prostate cancer: 1.5 T endo-coil dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MR spectroscopy-correlation with prostate biopsy and prostatectomy histopathological data [J].
Chabanova, Elizaveta ;
Balslev, Ingegerd ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Hansen, Alastair ;
Jakobsen, Henrik ;
Kromann-Andersen, Bjarne ;
Norgaard, Nis ;
Horn, Thomas ;
Thomsen, Henrik S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 80 (02) :292-296
[5]   Clinical staging of prostate cancer: a computer-simulated study of transperineal prostate biopsy [J].
Crawford, ED ;
Wilson, SS ;
Torkko, KC ;
Hirano, D ;
Stewart, JS ;
Brammell, C ;
Wilson, RS ;
Kawata, N ;
Sullivan, H ;
Lucia, MS ;
Werahera, PN .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 96 (07) :999-1004
[6]   REPEAT PROSTATE NEEDLE-BIOPSY - WHO NEEDS IT [J].
ELLIS, WJ ;
BRAWER, MK .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 153 (05) :1496-1498
[7]   Multimodality Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer [J].
Engelbrecht, Marc R. ;
Puech, Philippe ;
Colin, Pierre ;
Akin, Oguz ;
Lemaitre, Laurent ;
Villers, Arnauld .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 (05) :677-684
[8]   Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils - Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging [J].
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Engelbrecht, Marc R. ;
Jager, Gerrit J. ;
Hartman, Robert P. ;
King, Bernard F. ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2007, 17 (04) :1055-1065
[9]   Localising Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging and 3D-MR Spectroscopic Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy [J].
Gbenou, Maximilien C. Goris ;
Peltier, Alexandre ;
Addla, Sanjai K. ;
Lemort, Marc ;
Bollens, Renaud ;
Larsimont, Denis ;
Roumeguere, Thierry ;
Schulman, Claude C. ;
van Velthoven, Roland .
UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 88 (01) :12-17
[10]   Prostate cancer:: Body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T -: Comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance [J].
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Takahashi, Satoru ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Huisman, Henkjan J. ;
Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa, Christina A. ;
Knipscheer, Ben C. ;
Kiemeney, Lambertus A. L. M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 244 (01) :184-195