A Scientometric Analysis of Scientific Productivity of Artificial Intelligence Research in India

被引:5
作者
Pandey, Shriram [1 ]
Verma, Manoj Kumar [2 ]
Shukla, Ravi [2 ]
机构
[1] Banaras Hindu Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Mizoram Univ, Dept Lib & Informat Sci, Aizawl 796001, Mizoram, India
关键词
Scientometrics; Artificial Intelligence; Collaboration Coefficient; Collaborative Index; Relative Growth Rate; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.5530/jscires.10.2.38
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
The study presents a scientometric analsyis of publications related to 'Artificial Intelligence' research in India during 2009-2018. In today's ICT driven world, artificial intelligence has taken up some tasks of our daily life to make it easier. As a consequence, extensive research is going on "Artificial Intelligence" to find out it's potential in knowledge development. The paper analyses the bibliographic data retrived from Scopus database extracted with a suitable search query. The study was conducted taking the chronological growth of research publications, relative growth rate, doubling time, scientometric profile of authors, document type of publications, source profile, keyword analysis, institution wise distribution of publications, funding agency wise distribution. The analysis was conducted using the MS-Excel. The study reveals that a maximum number of publications are in the form of conference procedings and articles. Artificial Intelligence, Learning system, algorithms, data mining are the keywords with maximum number of occurences. The findings of the study implies India need become more competitive with the world leaders in artificial intelligence research. To get more return from AI applications, the stakeholders are required to play a catalytic role to build and strengthen research capacity in the nation by paving quality research environment, adequate funding, research incentives, and development of IT infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 250
页数:6
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Aayog NITI 2018a National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence
[2]  
Bhattacharjee KK, 2019, IN C IND ENG ENG MAN, P916, DOI [10.1109/ieem44572.2019.8978798, 10.1109/IEEM44572.2019.8978798]
[3]   The h-index and self-citations [J].
Engqvist, Leif ;
Frommen, Joachim G. .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2008, 23 (05) :250-252
[4]   A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies [J].
Grant, Maria J. ;
Booth, Andrew .
HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES JOURNAL, 2009, 26 (02) :91-108
[5]   Artificial Intelligence Research in India: A Scientometric Assessment of Publications Output during 2007-16 [J].
Gupta, B. M. ;
Dhawan, S. M. .
DESIDOC JOURNAL OF LIBRARY & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 38 (06) :416-422
[6]   A scientometric analysis of mobile technology publications [J].
Kumar, R. Santha ;
Kaliyaperumal, K. .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 105 (02) :921-939
[7]  
Mahapatra M., 1985, Proceedings of the 15th IASLIC Conference, Bangalore, P61
[8]   What makes a good systematic review and meta-analysis? [J].
Moller, A. M. ;
Myles, P. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2016, 117 (04) :428-430
[9]   Global Research on Artificial Intelligence from 1990-2014: Spatially-Explicit Bibliometric Analysis [J].
Niu, Jiqiang ;
Tang, Wenwu ;
Xu, Feng ;
Zhou, Xiaoyan ;
Song, Yanan .
ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2016, 5 (05)
[10]   Artificial Intelligence Research in India: A Scientometric Analysis [J].
Shrivastava R. ;
Mahajan P. .
Science and Technology Libraries, 2016, 35 (02) :136-151