Do children benefit from universal early childhood education and care? A meta-analysis of evidence from natural experiments

被引:126
作者
van Huizen, Thomas [1 ]
Plantenga, Janneke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Sch Econ, Postbus 80125, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Preschool; Child care; Universal ECEC; Child development; Meta-analysis; PRE-K PROGRAM; REGRESSION-DISCONTINUITY DESIGN; LONG-RUN OUTCOMES; HEAD-START; COGNITIVE-DEVELOPMENT; POLICY IMPLICATIONS; PRIVATE PROVISION; PRESCHOOL; PREKINDERGARTEN; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.08.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the effects of universal Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) on child development and children's later life outcomes. Using meta-analytical techniques, we synthesize the findings from recent studies that exploit natural experiments to identify the causal effects of universal ECEC arrangements. We use 250 estimates from 30 studies conducted between 2005 and 2017. Our meta-regressions include estimates on a wide variety of children's outcomes, ranging from (non-)cognitive development measured during early childhood to educational outcomes and earnings in adulthood. Overall, the evidence on universal ECEC is mixed. Age of enrollment is not a major factor in explaining the impact. Some evidence indicates that more intensive programs produce more favorable outcomes. Program quality matters critically: high quality arrangements consistently generate positive child outcomes. Publicly provided programs produce more favorable effects than privately provided (and mixed) programs. There is no evidence of fading out. Furthermore, the gains of ECEC are concentrated within children from lower socioeconomic families.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 222
页数:17
相关论文
共 94 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 8696 IZA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, OECD FAM DAT
[3]   Universal child care, maternal labor supply, and family well-being [J].
Baker, Michael ;
Gruber, Jonathan ;
Milligan, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2008, 116 (04) :709-745
[4]   Comparative benefit-cost analysis of the Abecedarian program and its policy implications [J].
Barnett, W. S. ;
Masse, Leonard N. .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2007, 26 (01) :113-125
[5]   Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention [J].
Barnett, W. S. .
SCIENCE, 2011, 333 (6045) :975-978
[6]   Earnings benefits of Tulsa's pre-K program for different income groups [J].
Bartik, Timothy J. ;
Gormley, William ;
Adelstein, Shirley .
ECONOMICS OF EDUCATION REVIEW, 2012, 31 (06) :1143-1161
[7]   Does state preschool crowd-out private provision? The impact of universal preschool on the childcare sector in Oklahoma and Georgia [J].
Bassok, Daphna ;
Fitzpatrick, Maria ;
Loeb, Susanna .
JOURNAL OF URBAN ECONOMICS, 2014, 83 :18-33
[8]   Giving children a better start: Preschool attendance and school-age profiles [J].
Berlinski, Samuel ;
Galiani, Sebastian ;
Manacorda, Marco .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2008, 92 (5-6) :1416-1440
[9]   The effect of pre-primary education on primary school performance [J].
Berlinski, Samuel ;
Galiani, Sebastian ;
Gertler, Paul .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ECONOMICS, 2009, 93 (1-2) :219-234
[10]   Meta-analysis in marketing when studies contain multiple measurements [J].
Bijmolt, THA ;
Pieters, RGM .
MARKETING LETTERS, 2001, 12 (02) :157-169