Environmental and energy assessment of biomass residues to biochar as fuel: A brief review with recommendations for future bioenergy systems

被引:88
作者
Lee, Mengshan [1 ]
Lin, Yi-Li [1 ]
Chiueh, Pei-Te [2 ]
Den, Walter [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Kaohsiung Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Safety Hlth & Environm Engn, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taiwan Univ, Grad Inst Environm Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Sci & Math, Inst Water Resources Sci & Technol, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Carbon abatement; Biomass residue; Agriculture waste; Bioenergy; Environmental trade-offs; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; CONSEQUENTIAL LCA; RICE STRAW; ETHANOL-PRODUCTION; KEY ISSUES; BIOETHANOL PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC-ASSESSMENT; FAST PYROLYSIS; CROP RESIDUES; POWER-PLANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119714
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study explores the environmental and energy benefits of biomass residues, including crop residues and agricultural waste, for the production of renewable energy in the form of biochar as fuel, in order to offer recommendations for policy makers, by reviewing information regarding the key environmental issues associated with the implementation of the systems. The highest environmental benefits for biochar-to-fuel systems were most observed in reduction of global warming potentials (i.e., carbon abatement), particularly for those integrated with combined heat and power technology, or for those incorporating electricity offsets from biochar combustion and co-firing. But all of these practices come at the cost of hidden environmental burdens, such as elevations in eutrophication, acidification, carcinogens and ecotoxicity impacts, as a consequence from land use change, additional infrastructure requirement or additional fertilizer application connected to biochar production or post-treatment. Other notable challenges, including regional availability of biomass residues, improper management of the residues, limited economic incentives, low energy efficiency and synergies, as well as mistreating adverse impacts from indirect land use change, were discussed. This suggests the flexibility to adjust the biomass-biochar ratio to optimize desired energy yields, carbon abatement and environmental beneficial objectives. Comprehensive analysis of the trade-offs between energy yields, carbon abatement and other associated environmental impacts is therefore recommended for future studies. Future studies in this field are also advised to explore the solution and to develop methodologies capable of quantifying the impacts and other equally relevant trade-offs, to better reflect the changes in real-world trends for decision making. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Potential of rice straw for bio-refining: An overview [J].
Abraham, Amith ;
Mathew, Anil Kuruvilla ;
Sindhu, Raveendran ;
Pandey, Ashok ;
Binod, Parameswaran .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 215 :29-36
[2]   Review of methodological choices in LCA of biorefinery systems - key issues and recommendations [J].
Ahlgren, Serina ;
Bjorklund, Anna ;
Ekman, Anna ;
Karlsson, Hanna ;
Berlin, Johanna ;
Borjesson, Pal ;
Ekvall, Tomas ;
Finnveden, Goran ;
Janssen, Matty ;
Strid, Ingrid .
BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2015, 9 (05) :606-619
[3]   Waste biorefinery in arid/semi-arid regions [J].
Bastidas-Oyanedel, Juan-Rodrigo ;
Fang, Chuanji ;
Almardeai, Saleha ;
Javid, Usama ;
Yousuf, Ahasa ;
Schmidt, Jens Ejbye .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 215 :21-28
[4]  
Bergman R.D., 2016, BIOCHAR REGIONAL SUP
[5]   Bioethanol production from rice straw: An overview [J].
Binod, Parameswaran ;
Sindhu, Raveendran ;
Singhania, Reeta Rani ;
Vikram, Surender ;
Devi, Lalitha ;
Nagalakshmi, Satya ;
Kurien, Noble ;
Sukumaran, Rajeev K. ;
Pandey, Ashok .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (13) :4767-4774
[6]   Sustainable Production of Bioenergy and Biochar from the Straw of High-Biomass Soybean Lines via Fast Pyrolysis [J].
Boateng, Akwasi A. ;
Mullen, Charles A. ;
Goldberg, Neil M. ;
Hicks, Kevin B. ;
Devine, Thomas E. ;
Lima, Isabel M. ;
McMurtrey, James E. .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2010, 29 (02) :175-183
[7]   Comparative analysis of attributional corporate greenhouse gas accounting, consequential life cycle assessment, and project/policy level accounting: A bioenergy case study [J].
Brander, Matthew .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 167 :1401-1414
[8]   Nitrous oxide and dinitrogen emissions from soil under different water regimes and straw amendment [J].
Cai, Z ;
Laughlin, RJ ;
Stevens, RJ .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2001, 42 (02) :113-121
[9]   Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems - A LCA case study [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Ulgiati, Sergio .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2010, 87 (01) :47-57
[10]   Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations [J].
Cherubini, Francesco ;
Bird, Neil D. ;
Cowie, Annette ;
Jungmeier, Gerfried ;
Schlamadinger, Bernhard ;
Woess-Gallasch, Susanne .
RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2009, 53 (08) :434-447