Ecological quality status assessment of tropical estuaries with benthic indices using differently derived reference conditions

被引:7
作者
Dias, Heidy Q. [1 ]
Sukumaran, Soniya [1 ]
Mulik, Jyoti [1 ]
Janakiram, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIR, Natl Inst Oceanog, Reg Ctr Andheri W, Mumbai 400053, Maharashtra, India
[2] Andhra Univ, Dept Marine Living Resources, Visakhapatnam 530003, Andhra Pradesh, India
关键词
Macroinvertebrates; Benthic indices; Reference conditions; Ecological quality status; Salinity zones; Tropical estuaries; YANGTZE-RIVER ESTUARY; MARINE BIOTIC INDEX; NATURAL VARIABILITY; AMBI; BAY; INTERCALIBRATION; COMMUNITIES; PARADOX; HEALTH; CHINA;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.113457
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Setting appropriate reference conditions (RCs) is critical for classifying the Ecological Quality Status (EcoQS) which is extremely challenging, considering the present-day estuaries. The EcoQS of three tropical estuaries was assessed by applying five different RCs to identify the best applicable method for the area. The AZTI's indices (AMBI and M-AMBI) categorised areas with sharper pollution gradient with ease, while classification of moderate-low polluted areas was ambiguous. Indices responded to chemical stressors more clearly in the impacted estuary compared to the less polluted estuaries. Ecological status assigned by the default RC (lowest AMBI and highest diversity and richness values) were more accurate than those obtained on application of other four types of RCs, owing to various estuarine constraints that are discussed herewith. Thus, prior to application, caution should be exercised while setting area-specific RCs. The inclusion of combination of AZTI's indices with professional judgment for successful appraisal of ecosystem is recommended.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Ecological quality of some Tunisian coast and lagoon locations, by using benthic community parameters and biotic indices [J].
Afli, Ahmed ;
Ayari, Rakia ;
Zaabi, Sana .
ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2008, 80 (02) :269-280
[2]   The Mediterranean intercalibration exercise on soft-bottom benthic invertebrates with special emphasis on the Italian situation [J].
Ambrogi, Anna Occhipinti ;
Forni, Giulia ;
Silvestri, Cecilia .
MARINE ECOLOGY-AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE, 2009, 30 (04) :495-504
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Methods of Seawater Analysis
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, PRIMER 7: User Manual/Tutorial
[5]   Assessing reference conditions and physico-chemical status according to the European Water Framework Directive: A case-study from the Basque Country (Northern Spain) [J].
Bald, J ;
Borja, A ;
Muxika, I ;
Franco, J ;
Valencia, V .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2005, 50 (12) :1508-1522
[6]   Natural variability and reference conditions: setting type-specific classification boundaries for lagoon macroinvertebrates in the Mediterranean and Black Seas [J].
Basset, Alberto ;
Barbone, Enrico ;
Borja, Angel ;
Elliott, Michael ;
Jona-Lasinio, Giovanna ;
Marques, Joao Carlos ;
Mazik, Krysia ;
Muxika, Inigo ;
Neto, Joao Magalhaes ;
Reizopoulou, Sofia ;
Rosati, Ilaria ;
Teixeira, Heliana .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2013, 704 (01) :325-345
[7]   Relationships between biotic indices, multiple stressors and natural variability in New Zealand estuaries [J].
Berthelsen, A. ;
Atalah, J. ;
Clark, D. ;
Goodwin, E. ;
Patterson, M. ;
Sinner, J. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 85 :634-643
[8]   Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems [J].
Birk, S. ;
Willby, N. J. ;
Kelly, M. G. ;
Bonne, W. ;
Borja, A. ;
Poikane, S. ;
van de Bund, W. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 454 :490-499
[9]   Assessing estuarine benthic quality conditions in Chesapeake Bay:: A comparison of three indices [J].
Borja, A. ;
Dauer, D. M. ;
Diaz, R. ;
Llanso, R. J. ;
Muxika, I. ;
Rodriguez, J. G. ;
Schaffner, L. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2008, 8 (04) :395-403
[10]   Guidelines for the use of AMBI (AZTI's Marine Biotic Index) in the assessment of the benthic ecological quality [J].
Borja, A ;
Muxika, H .
MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2005, 50 (07) :787-789