Contingent values as implicit contracts: estimating minimum legal willingness to pay for conservation of large carnivores in Sweden

被引:13
作者
Bostedt, Goran [1 ]
Ericsson, Goran [2 ]
Kindberg, Jonas [2 ]
机构
[1] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Forest Econ, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Anim Ecol, S-90183 Umea, Sweden
关键词
contingent valuation; willingness-to-pay; minimum legal WTP; discrete choice; carnivores;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-007-9103-x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Mean willingness-to-pay (WTP) based on multiple bounded, discrete choice responses from contingent valuation surveys are normally obtained using some kind of parametric estimator. This paper instead exploits the possibility to interpret the response to the discrete-choice question as an implicit contract between the researcher and the respondent, resulting in a minimum legal WTP (MLW) estimator. Never previously used in valuation literature, it is used in this paper to estimate the WTP for the preservation of large carnivores in Sweden, based on a large scale, national survey. Results show that MLW estimates only were 12-19% of the comparable parametric estimates. In keeping with other results in contingent valuation literature, we find that the MLW estimates are positively related to the educational level, income and the fraction of urban population, while negatively related to age. Among the advantages of the MLW estimator is its transparency as well as the fact that it rests on a contractual notion of WTP.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 198
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Analysis of contingent valuation data with multiple bids and response options allowing respondents to express uncertainty [J].
Alberini, A ;
Boyle, K ;
Welsh, M .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (01) :40-62
[2]  
Arrow K., 1993, FED REGISTER, V58, P4602
[3]   MEASURING VALUES OF EXTRA-MARKET GOODS - ARE INDIRECT MEASURES BIASED [J].
BISHOP, RC ;
HEBERLEIN, TA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1979, 61 (05) :926-930
[4]   Obtaining welfare bounds in discrete-response valuation studies:: A non-parametric approach [J].
Boman, M ;
Bostedt, G ;
Kriström, B .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1999, 75 (02) :284-294
[5]  
BOSTEDT G, 1996, ENVIRON RESOUR ECON, V8, P119
[6]  
Boyle K. J., 2003, PRIMER NONMARKET VAL
[7]  
Carson R., 2005, CONTINGENT VALUATION
[8]  
Carson R. T., 1989, Using surveys to value public goods: The contingent valuation method
[9]   A contingent valuation estimate of the benefits of wolves in Minnesota [J].
Chambers, CM ;
Whitehead, JC .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 26 (02) :249-267
[10]   Using donation mechanisms to value nonuse benefits from public goods [J].
Champ, PA ;
Bishop, RC ;
Brown, TC ;
McCollum, DW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 1997, 33 (02) :151-162