Quality Measurement and Patient Outcomes in Inpatient Behavioral Health: Assessing the Current Framework

被引:0
作者
Nowlin, Rachel B. [1 ]
Brown, Sarah K. [1 ]
Ingram, Jessica R. [1 ]
Smith, Johan R. [2 ]
机构
[1] MHO, Lewisville, TX 75057 USA
[2] MHO, Hlth Informat, Lewisville, TX 75057 USA
关键词
behavioral health; quality measurement; patient outcomes; quality improvement; MENTAL-HEALTH; SERVICE ACCREDITATION; CARE; PERFORMANCE; VALIDATION; OPPORTUNITIES; CHALLENGES; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000319
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Quality measurement across healthcare is undertaken with a goal of improving care and outcomes for patients; however, the relationship between quality measurement and patient outcomes remains largely untested, particularly in inpatient behavioral health. Using a retrospective quantitative design, we assessed 142 behavioral health organizations' quality data submitted to the Hospital-Based Inpatient Psychiatric Services and Inpatient Psychiatric Facility Quality Reporting programs from 2017 to 2018 and tested relationships between compliance on 16 quality measures and symptom improvement on patient self-report outcomes (SROs) at the facility level. Performance on many quality measures was negatively skewed (at least four have almost no room for improvement on average), and there was high interrelatedness between most quality measures. Nine of the assessed measures correlated with patient SROs but not in clear groupings. Findings indicate that an underlying organizational construct may be driving compliance rates on quality measures, but the measures are not linked to treatment outcomes as expected. We encourage an expansion of the current framework of behavioral health quality measurement beyond process and organization and suggest the addition of patient outcomes such as SROs as quality measures to directly assess patient improvement.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 364
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Impact of Accreditation on the Quality of Healthcare Services: a Systematic Review of the Literature
    Alkhenizan, Abdullah
    Shaw, Charles
    [J]. ANNALS OF SAUDI MEDICINE, 2011, 31 (04) : 407 - 416
  • [2] [Anonymous], HOSP ACCR FACT SHEET
  • [3] [Anonymous], What is hospital compare?
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2006, IMPR QUAL HLTH CAR M
  • [5] [Anonymous], FAST FACTS US HOSP
  • [6] Evidence-based practice in psychology
    Goodheart C.D.
    Levant R.F.
    Barlow D.H.
    Carter J.
    Davidson K.W.
    Hagglund K.J.
    Hollon S.D.
    Johnson J.D.
    Leviton L.C.
    Mahrer A.R.
    Newman F.L.
    Norcross J.C.
    Silverman D.K.
    Smedley B.D.
    Wampold B.E.
    Westen D.I.
    Yates B.T.
    Zane N.W.
    Reed G.M.
    Bufka L.F.
    Nelson P.D.
    Belar C.D.
    Bullock M.
    [J]. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 61 (04) : 271 - 285
  • [7] Benefits of Joint Commission accreditation, JOINT COMM FACT SHEE
  • [8] Improvement in quality of hospital care during accreditation: A nationwide stepped-wedge study
    Bogh, Soren Bie
    Falstie-Jensen, Anne Mette
    Hollnagel, Erik
    Holst, Rene
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Johnsen, Soren Paaske
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2016, 28 (06) : 715 - 720
  • [9] Health service accreditation as a predictor of clinical and organisational performance: a blinded, random, stratified study
    Braithwaite, Jeffrey
    Greenfield, David
    Westbrook, Johanna
    Pawsey, Marjorie
    Westbrook, Mary
    Gibberd, Robert
    Naylor, Justine
    Nathan, Sally
    Robinson, Maureen
    Runciman, Bill
    Jackson, Margaret
    Travaglia, Joanne
    Johnston, Brian
    Yen, Desmond
    McDonald, Heather
    Low, Lena
    Redman, Sally
    Johnson, Betty
    Corbett, Angus
    Hennessy, Darlene
    Clark, John
    Lancaster, Judie
    [J]. QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2010, 19 (01): : 14 - 21
  • [10] Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2018, INP PSYCH QUAL REP P