Personalized brachytherapy dose reconstruction using deep learning

被引:27
作者
Akhavanallaf, Azadeh [1 ]
Mohammadi, Reza [2 ]
Shiri, Isaac [1 ]
Salimi, Yazdan [1 ]
Arabi, Hossein [1 ]
Zaidi, Habib [1 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, CH-1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
[2] Iran Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Med Phys, Tehran, Iran
[3] Univ Geneva, Geneva Univ Neuroctr, CH-1205 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, NL-9700 RB Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Southern Denmark, Dept Nucl Med, DK-500 Odense, Denmark
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Brachytherapy; Dose reconstruction; Heterogeneity correction; Monte Carlo; Deep learning; MONTE-CARLO SIMULATIONS; INTERSEED ATTENUATION; ENERGY; RECOMMENDATIONS; DOSIMETRY;
D O I
10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104755
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: Accurate calculation of the absorbed dose delivered to the tumor and normal tissues improves treatment gain factor, which is the major advantage of brachytherapy over external radiation therapy. To address the simplifications of TG-43 assumptions that ignore the dosimetric impact of medium heterogene-ities, we proposed a deep learning (DL)-based approach, which improves the accuracy while requiring a reasonable computation time. Materials and methods: We developed a Monte Carlo (MC)-based personalized brachytherapy dosimetry simulator (PBrDoseSim), deployed to generate patient-specific dose distributions. A deep neural network (DNN) was trained to predict personalized dose distributions derived from MC simulations, serving as ground truth. The paired channel input used for the training is composed of dose distribution kernel in water medium along with the full-volumetric density maps obtained from CT images reflecting medium heterogeneity. Results: The predicted single-dwell dose kernels were in good agreement with MC-based kernels serving as reference, achieving a mean relative absolute error (MRAE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of 1.16 +/- 0.42% and 4.2 +/- 2.7 x 10(-4) (Gy.sec(-1)/voxel), respectively. The MRAE of the dose volume histograms (DVHs) between the DNN and MC calculations in the clinical target volume were 1.8 +/- 0.86%, 0.56 +/- 0.56%, and 1.48 +/- 0.72% for D90, V150, and V100, respectively. For bladder, sigmoid, and rectum, the MRAE of D5cc between the DNN and MC calculations were 2.7 +/- 1.7%, 1.9 +/- 1.3%, and 2.1 +/- 1.7%, respectively. Conclusion: The proposed DNN-based personalized brachytherapy dosimetry approach exhibited comparable performance to the MC method while overcoming the computational burden of MC calculations and over-simplifications of TG-43.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Influence of breast composition and interseed attenuation in dose calculations for post-implant assessment of permanent breast 103Pd seed implant [J].
Afsharpour, Hossein ;
Pignol, Jean-Philippe ;
Keller, Brian ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Reniers, Brigitte ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Beaulieu, Luc .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (16) :4547-4561
[2]   COLLAPSED CONE CONVOLUTION OF RADIANT ENERGY FOR PHOTON DOSE CALCULATION IN HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA [J].
AHNESJO, A .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1989, 16 (04) :577-592
[3]   Whole-body voxel-based internal dosimetry using deep learning [J].
Akhavanallaf, Azadeh ;
Shiri, Iscaac ;
Arabi, Hossein ;
Zaidi, Habib .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2021, 48 (03) :670-682
[4]   The effect of patient inhomogeneities in oesophageal 192Ir HDR brachytherapy:: a Monte Carlo and analytical dosimetry study [J].
Anagnostopoulos, G ;
Baltas, D ;
Pantelis, E ;
Papagiannis, P ;
Sakelliou, L .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2004, 49 (12) :2675-2685
[5]   Applications of artificial intelligence and deep learning in molecular imaging and radiotherapy [J].
Arabi, Hossein ;
Zaidi, Habib .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HYBRID IMAGING, 2020, 4 (01)
[6]   Report of the Task Group 186 on model-based dose calculation methods in brachytherapy beyond the TG-43 formalism: Current status and recommendations for clinical implementation [J].
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Tedgren, Asa Carlsson ;
Carrier, Jean-Francois ;
Davis, Stephen D. ;
Mourtada, Firas ;
Rivard, Mark J. ;
Thomson, Rowan M. ;
Verhaegen, Frank ;
Wareing, Todd A. ;
Williamson, Jeffrey F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (10) :6208-6236
[7]  
BERGER MJ, 1968, J NUCL MED, VS, P17
[8]   Dosimetric comparison between TG43/TG186 algorithms and manual/inverse optimization in brachytherapy [J].
Brun, T. ;
Torfeh, E. .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 123 :S986-S986
[9]   Comparison of Planning Quality and Efficiency Between Conventional and Knowledge-based Algorithms in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients Using Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy [J].
Chang, Amy T. Y. ;
Hung, Albert W. M. ;
Cheung, Fion W. K. ;
Lee, Michael C. H. ;
Chan, Oscar S. H. ;
Philips, Helen ;
Cheng, Yung-Tang ;
Ng, Wai-Tong .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (03) :981-990
[10]   A feasibility study on an automated method to generate patient-specific dose distributions for radiotherapy using deep learning [J].
Chen, Xinyuan ;
Men, Kuo ;
Li, Yexiong ;
Yi, Junlin ;
Dai, Jianrong .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (01) :56-64