Comparison of accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to the kidneys following radioligand therapy with 177Lu-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different background correction methods

被引:1
作者
Mahmoudi, Elahe [1 ]
Pirayesh, Elahe [2 ]
Deevband, Mohammad Reza [1 ]
Amoui, Mahasti [2 ]
Rad, Mehrdad Ghorbani [3 ]
机构
[1] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Dept Biomed Engn & Med Phys, Tehran, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Sch Med, Dept Nucl Med, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shohada E Tajrish Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Tehran, Iran
来源
INDIAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 2022年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
Absorbed dose; background correction; conjugate view method; radioligand therapy; MONTE-CARLO; TUMOR DOSIMETRY; ORGAN ACTIVITY; QUANTIFICATION; IMAGES;
D O I
10.4103/ijnm.ijnm_134_21
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To improve the accuracy of activity image quality, scatter correction is a critical method. The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy in calculation of absorbed dose to patients following radioligand therapy (RLT) with Lu-177-DKFZ-PSMA-617 by two different methods of background correction in the conjugate view method. Materials and Methods: This study involved 10 patients. The individualized patient dosimetry calculations were based on whole-body planar scintigraphy images acquired in 10 patients with a mean age of 71.4 +/- 6.07 years (range 63-85 years) at approximately 0-2 h, 4-6 h, 18-24 h, and 36-48 h after administration of the mean 6253 +/- 826.4 MBq (range 5500-7400 MBq) of Lu-177-DKFZ-PSMA-617. Organ activities were calculated using the conjugate view method by Buijs and conventional background correction. Eventually, the absorbed dose of radiation was calculated using Medical Internal Radiation Dose formalism. Results: The dose per unit of injected activity (mGy/MBq) +/- standard deviation for kidney using Buijs and conventional methods was 1.05 +/- 0.11 and 0.63 +/- 0.14, respectively. Conclusion: The Buijs background correction method was more accurate than the conventional method.
引用
收藏
页码:121 / 125
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Dynamic 99mTc-MAG3 renography: images for quality control obtained by combining pharmacokinetic modelling, an anthropomorphic computer phantom and Monte Carlo simulated scintillation camera imaging [J].
Brolin, Gustav ;
Gleisner, Katarina Sjogreen ;
Ljungberg, Michael .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (10) :3145-3161
[2]  
Buijs WCAM, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P2167
[3]   Effect of Patient Morphology on Dosimetric Calculations for Internal Irradiation as Assessed by Comparisons of Monte Carlo Versus Conventional Methodologies [J].
Divoli, Antigoni ;
Chiavassa, Sophie ;
Ferrer, Ludovic ;
Barbet, Jacques ;
Flux, Glenn D. ;
Bardies, Manuel .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2009, 50 (02) :316-323
[4]   68Ga-PSMA PET/MR with multimodality image analysis for primary prostate cancer [J].
Eiber, Matthias ;
Nekolla, Stephan G. ;
Maurer, Tobias ;
Weirich, Gregor ;
Wester, Hans-Juergen ;
Schwaiger, Markus .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2015, 40 (06) :1769-1771
[5]   Clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry: the quest for the "Holy Gray" [J].
Flux, Glenn ;
Bardies, Manuel ;
Chiesa, Carlo ;
Monsieurs, Myriam ;
Savolainen, Sauli ;
Strand, Sven-Erik ;
Lassmann, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (10) :1699-1700
[6]   Comparison of I-131 Radioimmunotherapy Tumor Dosimetry: Unit Density Sphere Model Versus Patient-Specific Monte Carlo Calculations [J].
Howard, David M. ;
Kearfott, Kimberlee J. ;
Wilderman, Scott J. ;
Dewaraja, Yuni K. .
CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, 2011, 26 (05) :615-621
[7]  
Jönsson L, 2005, J NUCL MED, V46, P1679
[8]  
Konijnenberg L, 2009, J NUCL MED, V50, P2092
[9]   Accuracy of the quantification of organ activity from planar gamma camera images [J].
Norrgren, K ;
Svegborn, SL ;
Areberg, J ;
Mattsson, S .
CANCER BIOTHERAPY AND RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS, 2003, 18 (01) :125-131
[10]   IMAGE QUANTIFICATION FOR RADIATION DOSE CALCULATIONS-LIMITATIONS AND UNCERTAINTIES [J].
Pereira, J. M. ;
Stabin, M. G. ;
Lima, F. R. A. ;
Guimaraes, M. I. C. C. ;
Forrester, J. W. .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2010, 99 (05) :688-701