Group Prenatal Care and Maternal Outcomes A Scoping Review

被引:3
作者
Tucker, Curisa M. [1 ]
Felder, Tisha M. [1 ]
Dail, Robin B. [1 ]
Lyndon, Audrey [2 ]
Allen, Kari-Claudia [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Carolina, Coll Nursing, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] NYU, Rory Meyers Coll Nursing, Clin Res, New York, NY USA
[3] Univ South Carolina, Dept Family & Prevent Med, Prisma Hlth USC Family Med Residency, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
关键词
Group prenatal care; Maternal health disparities; Maternal morbidity and mortality; Maternal outcomes; Prenatal care; Racism; PATIENT-PROVIDER COMMUNICATION; CENTERINGPREGNANCY; PREGNANCY; BIRTH; WOMEN; RISK; MORTALITY; WEIGHT; MODEL; TERM;
D O I
10.1097/NMC.0000000000000766
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Purpose: The objective of this study was to examine the current state of literature on group prenatal care and its impact on maternal outcomes and racial disparities in adverse maternal outcomes. Design: We conducted a scoping review of literature published between January 2010 and December 2020 using the PRISMA-ScR reporting checklist. Methods: Eligible studies were identified using key words and MeSH terms in PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Inclusion criteria were studies that were (a) conducted in the United States; (b) published between January 2010 and December 2020; (c) in English; (d) focused on the primary investigation of group prenatal care and reporting on maternal comorbidity outcomes; and (e) an observational study or clinical trial. Results: Nine studies met inclusion criteria. They reported on outcomes of preeclampsia, gestational hypertension, gestational diabetes mellitus, final A1C among patients with gestational diabetes mellitus, and postpartum hemorrhage. None reported on racial disparities for minoritized populations. Among all reported maternal outcomes, results were mixed, providing inconclusive evidence. Clinical Implications: Outcomes from group prenatal care focus more on neonatal outcomes than maternal outcomes. More studies are needed with stronger designs. Given pervasive racial disparities in U.S. maternal mortality, future studies should assess how group prenatal care participation may contribute to fewer experiences of racial discrimination and implicit bias for Black women in maternity care.
引用
收藏
页码:314 / 322
页数:9
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   The Impact of CenteringPregnancy Group Prenatal Care on Birth Outcomes in Medicaid Eligible Women [J].
Abshire, Chelsea ;
Mcdowell, Misty ;
Crockett, Amy H. ;
Fleischer, Nancy L. .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2019, 28 (07) :919-928
[2]   Information and power: Women of color's experiences interacting with health care providers in pregnancy and birth [J].
Altman, Molly R. ;
Oseguera, Talita ;
McLemore, Monica R. ;
Kantrowitz-Gordon, Ira ;
Franck, Linda S. ;
Lyndon, Audrey .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 238
[3]  
Anderson B., 2019, The maternal health crisis in American: Nursing implications for advocacy and practice
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, GUID PER CAR
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Types of anthrax
[7]   Voices Along the Journey: Midwives' Perceptions of Implementing the CenteringPregnancy Model of Prenatal Care [J].
Baldwin, Karen ;
Phillips, Gail .
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2011, 20 (04) :210-217
[8]   Intensive Approaches to Prenatal Care May Reduce Risk of Gestational Diabetes [J].
Benatar, Sarah ;
Paez, Kathryn ;
Johnston, Emily M. ;
Lucado, Jennifer ;
Castillo, Graciela ;
Cross-Barnet, Caitlin ;
Hill, Ian .
JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 30 (05) :713-721
[9]   A systematic overview of the literature regarding group prenatal care for high-risk pregnant women [J].
Byerley, Brittany M. ;
Haas, David M. .
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2017, 17
[10]   Group versus traditional prenatal care in low-risk women delivering at term: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Carter, E. B. ;
Barbier, K. ;
Sarabia, R. ;
Macones, G. A. ;
Cahill, A. G. ;
Tuuli, M. G. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2017, 37 (07) :769-771