Prediction models for clinical outcome after cochlear implantation: a systematic review

被引:16
作者
Velde, H. M. [1 ,2 ]
Rademaker, M. M. [1 ,2 ]
Damen, J. A. A. [3 ]
Smit, A. L. [1 ,2 ]
Stegeman, I [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Otorhinolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Brain Ctr, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Ophthalmol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Univ Med Ctr, Epidemiol & Data Sci, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Prediction models; Cochlear implantation; Systematic review; SPEECH RECOGNITION; PERFORMANCE; EXPLANATION; VALIDATION; ADULTS; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.04.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Cochlear implants (CIs) are implantable hearing devices with a wide variation in clinical outcome between patients. We aim to provide an overview of the literature on prediction models and their performance for clinical outcome after cochlear implantation in bilateral hearing loss or deafness. Study Design and Setting: In this systematic review, studies describing the development or external validation of a multivariable model for predicting clinical CI outcome were eligible for selection. Results: A total of 4,042 references were screened. We included nine development studies and one external validation study. The outcome measure of all development studies was speech perception performance after cochlear implantation. The most commonly used model predictors were duration of hearing loss or deafness ( n = 7), different types of preoperative measurements ( n = 5), and etiology ( n = 3). In three studies, crucial information to enable the model to be used for individual risk prediction was missing. One study performed internal validation,two models were externally validated. One study reported specific discrimination or calibration performance measures. Conclusion: Although many articles describe development studies of prediction models for speech perception performance after cochlear implantation, the value of most of these models for their application in clinical practice remains unclear. Therefore, research should focus on increasing the clinical relevance of existing CI outcome prediction models. (c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/ by/ 4.0/ )
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 194
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Prognostic models for outcome prediction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: systematic review and critical appraisal [J].
Bellou, Vanesa ;
Belbasis, Lazaros ;
Konstantinidis, Athanasios K. ;
Tzoulaki, Ioanna ;
Evangelou, Evangelos .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2019, 367
[2]   Cochlear implantation outcomes in adults: A scoping review [J].
Boisvert, Isabelle ;
Reis, Mariana ;
Au, Agnes ;
Cowan, Robert ;
Dowell, Richard C. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05)
[3]  
Collins GS, 2015, J CLIN EPIDEMIOL, V68, P112, DOI [10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.1111/eci.12376, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025]
[4]   Methodological standards for the development and evaluation of clinical prediction rules: a review of the literature [J].
Laura E. Cowley ;
Daniel M. Farewell ;
Sabine Maguire ;
Alison M. Kemp .
Diagnostic and Prognostic Research, 3 (1)
[5]   Prediction models for cardiovascular disease risk in the general population: systematic review [J].
Damen, Johanna A. A. G. ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Schuit, Ewoud ;
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Collins, Gary S. ;
Tzoulaki, Ioanna ;
Lassale, Camille M. ;
Siontis, George C. M. ;
Chiocchia, Virginia ;
Roberts, Corran ;
Schlussel, Michael Maia ;
Gerry, Stephen ;
Black, James A. ;
Heus, Pauline ;
van der Schouw, Yvonne T. ;
Peelen, Linda M. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 353
[6]   A guide to systematic review and meta-analysis of prediction model performance [J].
Debray, Thomas P. A. ;
Damen, Johanna A. A. G. ;
Snell, Kym I. E. ;
Ensor, Joie ;
Hooft, Lotty ;
Reitsma, Johannes B. ;
Riley, Richard D. ;
Moons, Karel G. M. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 356
[7]   Cochlear Implantation: An Overview [J].
Deep, Nicholas L. ;
Dowling, Eric M. ;
Jethanamest, Daniel ;
Carlson, Matthew L. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY PART B-SKULL BASE, 2019, 80 (02) :169-177
[8]   Cochlear implant outcomes in the elderly: a uni- and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors [J].
Favaretto, Niccolo ;
Marioni, Gino ;
Brotto, Davide ;
Sorrentino, Flavia ;
Gheller, Flavia ;
Castiglione, Alessandro ;
Montino, Silvia ;
Giacomelli, Luciano ;
Trevisi, Patrizia ;
Martini, Alessandro ;
Bovo, Roberto .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2019, 276 (11) :3089-3094
[9]   Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: The effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance [J].
Friedland, DR ;
Venick, HS ;
Niparko, JK .
OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2003, 24 (04) :582-589
[10]  
GANTZ BJ, 1993, ADV OTO-RHINO-LARYNG, V48, P153