Dexmedetomidine in combination with ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication: A meta-analysis

被引:14
作者
Li, Hong-pei [1 ]
Liu, Kun-peng [1 ]
Yao, Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Int Hosp, 1 Shengmingyuan Rd,Zhongguancun Life Sci Pk, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Sedation; Pediatrics; Hemodynamics; Adverse events; PERIOPERATIVE DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; SEVERE BRADYCARDIA; PROPOFOL-KETAMINE; ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.073
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of combinational use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine (DEX-KET) for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication. Methods: Relevant studies were identified after a literature search in electronic databases and study selection was based on precise eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of mean differences were performed to examine differences in sedation onset and recovery times between DEX-KET and comparators. Changes from baseline in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were pooled. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed to estimate incidence of adverse events. Results: 15 studies (1087 patients) were included. Onset of sedation was significantly shorter in DEX-KET than in DEX group. HR declined in DEX-KET group from start (-3.5 beats per minute (BPM) [95% CI: -5.1, -1.9]) through midpoint (-7.2 BPM [95% CI: -12.1, -2.3]) and at end of sedation (-8.7 BPM [95% CI: -13.1, -4.4]). Decrease in HR after DEX administration at start was -11.6 BPM [95% CI: -16.0, -7.1] and remained consistent afterward. There was no change in MAP during DEX-KET sedation. However, after DEX administration, MAP decreased by -6.9 [95% CI: -10.4, -3.3] at start, -7.8 [95% CI: -11.4, -4.2] at middle, and by -6.6 [95% CI: -14.4, 1.1] at end of sedation. Incidence of hypotension was 3% [95% CI: 0, 9] in DEX-KET, 7% [95% CI: 2,14] in DEX, and 0% [95% CI: 0, 2] in KET groups. Incidence of bradycardia was 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] with DEX-KET and 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] with DEX. Incidence of oxygen desaturation was 3% [95% CI: 0, 8] in DEX-KET, 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] in DEX, 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] in KET, and 13% [95% CI: 6, 21] in PROP-KET groups. MIDA-KET sedation had 13% [95% CI: 4, 25] incidence of tachycardia. Conclusions: DEX-KET for pediatric sedation results in better sedation outcomes than DEX or KET by shortening onset of sedation and recovery while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability with low incidence of adverse events. DEX sedation was associated with higher incidence of bradycardia. Higher incidence of oxygen desaturation was observed with KET and PROP-KET whereas MIDA-KET was associated with higher incidence of tachycardia. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 448
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Uncovering the Benefits of the Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Combination for Procedural Sedation during the Italian COVID-19 Pandemic
    Riccardi, Alessandro
    Serra, Sossio
    De Iaco, Fabio
    Fabbri, Andrea
    Shiffer, Dana
    Voza, Antonio
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [42] Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam as intranasal premedication for intravenous deep sedation in pediatric dental treatment
    Cheng, Tong
    Liu, Yun
    Li, Bing-Hua
    Wu, Xiao-Ran
    Xia, Bin
    Yang, Xu-Dong
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL SCIENCES, 2024, 19 (01) : 285 - 291
  • [43] Intranasal dexmedetomidine and intravenous ketamine for procedural sedation in a child with alpha-mannosidosis: a magic bullet?
    Trevisan, Matteo
    Romano, Sara
    Barbi, Egidio
    Bruno, Irene
    Murru, Flora Maria
    Cozzi, Giorgio
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2019, 45 (01)
  • [44] Procedural sedation in children for fractionated radiation treatment: Intranasal dexmedetomidine versus oral midazolam and ketamine
    Das, Rekha
    Das, Rajat
    Jena, Manoranjan
    Janka, Janaki
    Mishra, Sunita
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 66 (10) : 687 - 693
  • [45] Opioids Safety in Pediatric Procedural Sedation with Ketamine
    Cohen, Neta
    Test, Gidon
    Pasternak, Yehonatan
    Singer-Harel, Dana
    Schneeweiss, Suzan
    Ratnapalan, Savithiri
    Schuh, Suzanne
    Finkelstein, Yaron
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 243 : 146 - +
  • [46] Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of dexmedetomidine to midazolam as premedication and a sedative agent in pediatric patients undergoing dental procedures
    Taneja, Saumya
    Jain, Anuj
    ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY-HEIDELBERG, 2023, 27 (04): : 547 - 557
  • [47] Comparative evaluation of intranasal midazolam-ketamine, dexmedetomidine-ketamine, midazolam-fentanyl, and dexmedetomidine-fentanyl combinations for procedural sedation and analgesia in pediatric dental patients: a randomized controlled trial
    Agarwal, Abhilasha
    Ansari, Afroz Alam
    Nath, Rajendra
    Chak, Rakesh Kumar
    Singh, Rajeev Kumar
    Khanna, Richa
    Singh, Prem Raj
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (02) : 69 - 81
  • [48] A retrospective comparison of ketamine dosing regimens for pediatric procedural sedation
    Heilbrunn, Benjamin R.
    Chang, Todd P.
    Liu, Deborah R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (02) : 111 - 116
  • [49] Safety and efficacy of the combination of esketamine and propofol in procedural sedation/analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Xiaoci
    Lin, Fong
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Xianwen
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (7-8) : 680 - 689
  • [50] Efficacy and safety of rectal chloral hydrate for pediatric procedural sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Zhe
    Qin, Fang
    Zeng, Linan
    Zhang, Lingli
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (35) : e39403