Dexmedetomidine in combination with ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication: A meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Hong-pei [1 ]
Liu, Kun-peng [1 ]
Yao, Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Int Hosp, 1 Shengmingyuan Rd,Zhongguancun Life Sci Pk, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Sedation; Pediatrics; Hemodynamics; Adverse events; PERIOPERATIVE DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; SEVERE BRADYCARDIA; PROPOFOL-KETAMINE; ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.073
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of combinational use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine (DEX-KET) for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication. Methods: Relevant studies were identified after a literature search in electronic databases and study selection was based on precise eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of mean differences were performed to examine differences in sedation onset and recovery times between DEX-KET and comparators. Changes from baseline in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were pooled. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed to estimate incidence of adverse events. Results: 15 studies (1087 patients) were included. Onset of sedation was significantly shorter in DEX-KET than in DEX group. HR declined in DEX-KET group from start (-3.5 beats per minute (BPM) [95% CI: -5.1, -1.9]) through midpoint (-7.2 BPM [95% CI: -12.1, -2.3]) and at end of sedation (-8.7 BPM [95% CI: -13.1, -4.4]). Decrease in HR after DEX administration at start was -11.6 BPM [95% CI: -16.0, -7.1] and remained consistent afterward. There was no change in MAP during DEX-KET sedation. However, after DEX administration, MAP decreased by -6.9 [95% CI: -10.4, -3.3] at start, -7.8 [95% CI: -11.4, -4.2] at middle, and by -6.6 [95% CI: -14.4, 1.1] at end of sedation. Incidence of hypotension was 3% [95% CI: 0, 9] in DEX-KET, 7% [95% CI: 2,14] in DEX, and 0% [95% CI: 0, 2] in KET groups. Incidence of bradycardia was 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] with DEX-KET and 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] with DEX. Incidence of oxygen desaturation was 3% [95% CI: 0, 8] in DEX-KET, 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] in DEX, 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] in KET, and 13% [95% CI: 6, 21] in PROP-KET groups. MIDA-KET sedation had 13% [95% CI: 4, 25] incidence of tachycardia. Conclusions: DEX-KET for pediatric sedation results in better sedation outcomes than DEX or KET by shortening onset of sedation and recovery while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability with low incidence of adverse events. DEX sedation was associated with higher incidence of bradycardia. Higher incidence of oxygen desaturation was observed with KET and PROP-KET whereas MIDA-KET was associated with higher incidence of tachycardia. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 448
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is the Addition of Dexmedetomidine to a Ketamine–Propofol Combination in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Sedation Useful?
    Ayşe Ülgey
    Recep Aksu
    Cihangir Bicer
    Aynur Akin
    Resul Altuntaş
    Aliye Esmaoğlu
    Ali Baykan
    Adem Boyaci
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2012, 33 : 770 - 774
  • [22] Dexmedetomidine versus propofol: An effective combination with ketamine for adult procedural sedation: A randomized clinical trial
    Esmaillian, Mehrdad
    Kouhestani, Soheila
    Azizkhani, Reza
    Heydari, Farhad
    Safavi, Mohammad Raza
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2023, 73 : 95 - 101
  • [23] Effect of oral premedication of midazolam, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine on pediatric sedation and ease of parental separation in anesthesia induction for elective surgery: A randomized clinical trial
    Zarei, Aref
    Modir, Hesameddin
    Mahmoodiyeh, Behnam
    Kamali, Alireza
    Zamani-Barsari, Farzad
    JOURNAL OF ACUTE DISEASE, 2022, 11 (04) : 133 - 139
  • [24] Intravenous Dexmedetomidine-Ketamine Versus Ketamine-Propofol for Procedural Sedation in Adults Undergoing Short Surgical Procedures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Kakarla, Anusha
    Senapati, Laxman K.
    Das, Asima
    Acharya, Mousumi
    Sukanya, Sailaja
    Pradhan, Amit
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (06)
  • [25] Comparison of nebulized dexmedetomidine and ketamine for premedication in pediatric patients undergoing hernia repair surgery: a randomized comparative trial
    Singariya, Geeta
    Malhotra, Namita
    Kamal, Manoj
    Jaju, Rishabh
    Aggarwal, Shruti
    Bihani, Pooja
    ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 17 (02): : 173 - 181
  • [26] A Comparative Evaluation of Nebulized Dexmedetomidine, Nebulized Ketamine, and Their Combination as Premedication for Outpatient Pediatric Dental Surgery
    Zanaty, Ola M.
    El Metainy, Shahira Ahmed
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2015, 121 (01) : 167 - 171
  • [27] Efficacy and safety of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal dexmedetomidine as a premedication before general anesthesia in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Dwivedi, Priyanka
    Patel, Tejas K.
    Bajpai, Vijeta
    Singh, Yashpal
    Tripathi, Alka
    Kishore, Suerkha
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2022, 69 (11): : 1405 - 1418
  • [28] Combination of Dexmedetomidine and Ketamine for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation
    Kim, Joong-Goo
    Lee, Han-Bin
    Jeon, Sang-Beom
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [29] Ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) vs propofol for procedural sedation and analgesia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jalili, Mohammad
    Bahreini, Maryam
    Doosti-Irani, Amin
    Masoomi, Rasoul
    Arbab, Mona
    Mirfazaelian, Hadi
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2016, 34 (03) : 558 - 569
  • [30] Dexmedetomidine Sedation Uses in Pediatric Procedural Sedation Outside the Operating Room
    McMorrow, Sheila P.
    Abramo, Thomas J.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 28 (03) : 292 - 296