Dexmedetomidine in combination with ketamine for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication: A meta-analysis

被引:14
|
作者
Li, Hong-pei [1 ]
Liu, Kun-peng [1 ]
Yao, Lan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Int Hosp, 1 Shengmingyuan Rd,Zhongguancun Life Sci Pk, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Ketamine; Sedation; Pediatrics; Hemodynamics; Adverse events; PERIOPERATIVE DEXMEDETOMIDINE; INTRANASAL DEXMEDETOMIDINE; SEVERE BRADYCARDIA; PROPOFOL-KETAMINE; ANESTHESIA; EFFICACY; MANAGEMENT; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.073
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of combinational use of dexmedetomidine and ketamine (DEX-KET) for pediatric procedural sedation or premedication. Methods: Relevant studies were identified after a literature search in electronic databases and study selection was based on precise eligibility criteria. Meta-analyses of mean differences were performed to examine differences in sedation onset and recovery times between DEX-KET and comparators. Changes from baseline in heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), were pooled. Meta-analyses of proportions were performed to estimate incidence of adverse events. Results: 15 studies (1087 patients) were included. Onset of sedation was significantly shorter in DEX-KET than in DEX group. HR declined in DEX-KET group from start (-3.5 beats per minute (BPM) [95% CI: -5.1, -1.9]) through midpoint (-7.2 BPM [95% CI: -12.1, -2.3]) and at end of sedation (-8.7 BPM [95% CI: -13.1, -4.4]). Decrease in HR after DEX administration at start was -11.6 BPM [95% CI: -16.0, -7.1] and remained consistent afterward. There was no change in MAP during DEX-KET sedation. However, after DEX administration, MAP decreased by -6.9 [95% CI: -10.4, -3.3] at start, -7.8 [95% CI: -11.4, -4.2] at middle, and by -6.6 [95% CI: -14.4, 1.1] at end of sedation. Incidence of hypotension was 3% [95% CI: 0, 9] in DEX-KET, 7% [95% CI: 2,14] in DEX, and 0% [95% CI: 0, 2] in KET groups. Incidence of bradycardia was 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] with DEX-KET and 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] with DEX. Incidence of oxygen desaturation was 3% [95% CI: 0, 8] in DEX-KET, 2% [95% CI: 0, 6] in DEX, 12% [95% CI: 5, 20] in KET, and 13% [95% CI: 6, 21] in PROP-KET groups. MIDA-KET sedation had 13% [95% CI: 4, 25] incidence of tachycardia. Conclusions: DEX-KET for pediatric sedation results in better sedation outcomes than DEX or KET by shortening onset of sedation and recovery while maintaining hemodynamic and respiratory stability with low incidence of adverse events. DEX sedation was associated with higher incidence of bradycardia. Higher incidence of oxygen desaturation was observed with KET and PROP-KET whereas MIDA-KET was associated with higher incidence of tachycardia. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:442 / 448
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An evaluation of dexmedetomidine in combination with midazolam in pediatric sedation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nie, Juan
    Li, Chenxi
    Yang, Ge
    Chang, Huihui
    Ding, Guicong
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [2] Premedication with dexmedetomidine in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng, Ke
    Wu, Shao-ru
    Ji, Fu-hai
    Li, Jian
    CLINICS, 2014, 69 (11) : 777 - 786
  • [3] Pediatric premedication: a double-blind randomized trial of dexmedetomidine or ketamine alone versus a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine
    Qiao, Hui
    Xie, Zhi
    Jia, Jie
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [4] Procedural Sedation With Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Ketamine in the Emergency Department
    Gregoire, Charles
    De Kock, Marc
    Henrie, Julie
    Cren, Rosen
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Penaloza, Andrea
    Verschuren, Franck
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (02) : 283 - 288
  • [5] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Elsaeidy, Ahmed Saad
    Ahmad, Aya Hisham Moussa
    Kohaf, Neveen A.
    Aboutaleb, Aya
    Kumar, Danisha
    Elsaeidy, Khaled Saad
    Mohamed, Ola saeed
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Shehata, Islam Mohammad
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2024, 28 (04) : 211 - 227
  • [6] The comparison of dexmedetomidine and ketamine for pediatric dental surgery A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies
    Qiu, Jin
    Luo, Zhifang
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (17)
  • [7] Procedural Sedation With Dexmedetomidine in Combination With Ketamine in the Emergency Department
    Gregoire, Charles
    De Kock, Marc
    Henrie, Julie
    Cren, Rosen
    Lavand'homme, Patricia
    Penaloza, Andrea
    Verschuren, Franck
    JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2022, 63 (01) : 283 - 289
  • [8] Is the Addition of Dexmedetomidine to a Ketamine-Propofol Combination in Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Sedation Useful?
    Ulgey, Ayse
    Aksu, Recep
    Bicer, Cihangir
    Akin, Aynur
    Altuntas, Resul
    Esmaoglu, Aliye
    Baykan, Ali
    Boyaci, Adem
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 33 (05) : 770 - 774
  • [9] The comparison of ketamine-dexmedetomidine (ketadex) and ketamine-propofol (ketofol) for procedural sedation in pediatric patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Gao, Peng-fei
    Li, Shi-yue
    Li, Yue
    Zhao, Le
    Luo, Qiang
    Ji, Yang
    HELIYON, 2022, 8 (10)
  • [10] A comparative evaluation of dexmedetomidine and midazolam in pediatric sedation: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
    Lang, Bingchen
    Zhang, Lingli
    Zhang, Wensheng
    Lin, Yunzhu
    Fu, Yuzhi
    Chen, Shouming
    CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS, 2020, 26 (08) : 862 - 875