Microarray amplification bias: loss of 30% differentially expressed genes due to long probe - poly(A)-tail distances

被引:14
作者
Boelens, Mirjam C. [1 ]
Meerman, Gerard J. te [1 ]
Gibcus, Johan H. [1 ]
Blokzijl, Tjasso [1 ]
Boezen, H. Marike [1 ]
Timens, Wim [1 ]
Postma, Dirkje S. [1 ]
Groen, Harry J. M. [1 ]
van den Berg, Anke [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Dept Pathol, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1186/1471-2164-8-277
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Background: Laser microdissection microscopy has become a rising tool to assess gene expression profiles of pure cell populations. Given the low yield of RNA, a second round of amplification is usually mandatory to yield sufficient amplified-RNA for microarray approaches. Since amplification induces truncation of RNA molecules, we studied the impact of a second round of amplification on identification of differentially expressed genes in relation to the probe - poly(A)-tail distances. Results: Disagreement was observed between gene expression profiles acquired after a second round of amplification compared to a single round. Thirty percent of the differentially expressed genes identified after one round of amplification were not detected after two rounds. These inconsistent genes have a significant longer probe - poly(A)-tail distance. qRT-PCR on unamplified RNA confirmed differential expression of genes with a probe - poly(A)-tail distance >500 nucleotides appearing only after one round of amplification. Conclusion: Our data demonstrate a marked loss of 30% of truly differentially expressed genes after a second round of amplification. Therefore, we strongly recommend improvement of amplification procedures and importance of microarray probe design to allow detection of all differentially expressed genes in case of limited amounts of RNA.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling
    Alter, O
    Brown, PO
    Botstein, D
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2000, 97 (18) : 10101 - 10106
  • [2] Quantitative analysis of mRNA amplification by in vitro transcription
    Baugh, L. R.
    Hill, A. A.
    Brown, E. L.
    Hunter, Craig P.
    [J]. NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 2001, 29 (05)
  • [3] Measuring agreement in method comparison studies
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (02) : 135 - 160
  • [4] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [5] COMPARING PAIRED DATA - A SIMULTANEOUS TEST FOR MEANS AND VARIANCES
    BRADLEY, EL
    BLACKWOOD, LG
    [J]. AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1989, 43 (04) : 234 - 235
  • [6] Analysis of Affymetrix GeneChip® data using amplified RNA
    Cope, L
    Hartman, SM
    Göhlmann, HWH
    Tiesman, JP
    Irizarry, RA
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2006, 40 (02) : 165 - +
  • [7] Laser capture microdissection
    EmmertBuck, MR
    Bonner, RF
    Smith, PD
    Chuaqui, RF
    Zhuang, ZP
    Goldstein, SR
    Weiss, RA
    Liotta, LA
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5289) : 998 - 1001
  • [8] Microarray analysis in clinical oncology:: pre-clinical optimization using needle core biopsies from xenograft tumors -: art. no. 20
    Goley, EM
    Anderson, SJ
    Ménard, C
    Chuang, E
    Lü, X
    Tofilon, PJ
    Camphausen, K
    [J]. BMC CANCER, 2004, 4 (1)
  • [9] Oligonucleotide microarray analysis of aminoallyl-labeled cDNA targets from linear RNA amplification
    Kaposi-Novak, P
    Lee, JS
    Mikaelyan, A
    Patel, V
    Thorgeirsson, SS
    [J]. BIOTECHNIQUES, 2004, 37 (04) : 580 - +
  • [10] Lin L, 1998, PDA J PHARM SCI TECH, V52, P55