Estimating Field Volatility of Soil Fumigants Using CHAIN_2D: Mitigation Methods and Comparison Against Chloropicrin and 1,3-Dichloropropene Field Observations

被引:11
作者
Cryer, S. A. [1 ]
van Wesenbeeck, I. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] DowAgroSciences, Indianapolis, IN 46268 USA
关键词
CHAIN_2D; Fumigant; Flux; 1,3-dichloropropene; Chloropicrin; Modeling; METHYL-BROMIDE VOLATILIZATION; ATMOSPHERIC VOLATILIZATION; CHAMBER METHODS; EMISSIONS; FILMS; PERMEABILITY; FUMIGATION; INJECTION; PROFILE; WATER;
D O I
10.1007/s10666-009-9208-4
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Academic, government, and industrial field researchers have generated a significant database of field studies of the volatility of soil applied fumigants. However, limited work exists in validating physical models against field volatility data sets and fully exploring the volatility parametric response surface. Field studies quantifying atmospheric flux for soil fumigants 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin are validated against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA Salinity Laboratory) soil physics model CHAIN_2D that was modified specifically for agronomic uses of soil fumigants. Comparison between model predictions and field observations for six unique field trials in five different states indicate that CHAIN_2D effectively captures the magnitude and duration of fumigant emission from soil observed experimentally with r(2) similar to 0.14-0.96 (avg. 0.66) for peak emission, and r(2) similar to 0.76-1.0 (avg. 0.91) for cumulative emissions (r equals the Pearson moment correlation coefficient). Correct prediction magnitudes suggest that CHAIN_2D is a useful tool for extrapolating flux predictions to diverse scenarios not addressed by field trials. Examples of mitigation strategies such as the use of agricultural films (tarps), increased soil injection depth, and management of soil water content, under near semi-infinite parameter combinations of soil, meteorological, and agronomic properties are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:309 / 318
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
AJWA H, 2007, 2007 ANN INT RES C M
[2]   Simulating nitrate drainage losses from a Walnut Creek watershed field [J].
Bakhsh, A ;
Hatfield, JL ;
Kanwar, RS ;
Ma, L ;
Ahuja, LR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2004, 33 (01) :114-123
[3]   MODELING 1,3-DICHLOROPROPENE FUMIGANT VOLATILIZATION WITH VAPOR-PHASE ADVECTION IN THE SOIL-PROFILE [J].
CHEN, C ;
GREEN, RE ;
THOMAS, DM ;
KNUTESON, JA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1995, 29 (07) :1816-1821
[4]   Predicting regional emissions and near-field air concentrations of soil fumigants using modest numerical algorithms: A case study using 1,3-dichloropropene [J].
Cryer, SA ;
van Wesenbeeck, IJ ;
Knuteson, JA .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2003, 51 (11) :3401-3409
[5]  
CRYER SA, ENV ENG SCI, V26, P171
[6]   DIRECT FIELD MEASUREMENT OF AMMONIA EMISSION AFTER INJECTION OF ANHYDROUS AMMONIA [J].
DENMEAD, OT ;
SIMPSON, JR ;
FRENEY, JR .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1977, 41 (05) :1001-1004
[7]   Design, fabrication, and application of a dynamic chamber for measuring gas emissions from soil [J].
Gao, F ;
Yates, SR ;
Yates, MV ;
Gan, JY ;
Ernst, FF .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (01) :148-153
[8]   Surface seals reduce 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin emissions in field tests [J].
Gao, Suduan ;
Trout, Thomas J. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2007, 36 (01) :110-119
[9]  
Knuteson JA, 1995, 210 NAT M AM CHEM SO
[10]   A COMPARISON OF THE AERODYNAMIC AND THE THEORETICAL-PROFILE-SHAPE METHODS FOR MEASURING PESTICIDE EVAPORATION FROM SOIL [J].
MAJEWSKI, MS ;
GLOTFELTY, DE ;
SEIBER, JN .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 23 (05) :929-938