Measurement of sperm DNA fragmentation using bright-field microscopy: comparison between sperm chromatin dispersion test and terminal uridine nick-end labeling assay

被引:44
作者
Zhang, Li-hong [1 ]
Qiu, Yi [2 ]
Wang, Ke-hua [1 ]
Wang, Qiuju [3 ]
Tao, Guozhen [2 ]
Wang, Lei-guang [2 ]
机构
[1] Shandong Res Inst Family Planning, Dept Reprod Med, Jinan 250002, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong Res Inst Family Planning, Key Lab Improving Birth Outcome Tech, Jinan 250002, Peoples R China
[3] Weifang Municipal Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Weifang, Peoples R China
关键词
Spermatozoa; DNA integrity; in situ nick-end labeling; DENSITY GRADIENT CENTRIFUGATION; INFERTILE MEN; HUMAN SPERMATOZOA; SEMEN PARAMETERS; IN-VITRO; MORPHOLOGY; INTEGRITY; FERTILIZATION; DENATURATION; FERTILE;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.04.034
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test with terminal deoxynucleotidyle transferase-mediated terminal uridine nick-end labeling (TUNEL) assay in assessing DNA fragmentation in human sperm through bright-field microscopy. Design: Prospectively designed, side-by-side comparative study. Setting: Medical genetics laboratory in a provincial research institution. Patient(s): Sixty male patients presented for infertility evaluation and 30 fertile, volunteer sperm donors. Intervention(s): Semen analysis, SCD test, and TUNEL assay on the same semen sample and on the same spermatozoa. Main Outcome Measure(s): Sperm DNA fragmentation, determined by SCD test score or TUNEL assay score. Result(s): Sperm chromatin dispersion test and TUNEL assay identified similar proportions of sperm cells with DNA fragmentation in the same semen samples. When the SCD test and TUNEL assay were performed simultaneously on the same spermatozoa, TUNEL-negative sperm showed a large halo, whereas TUNEL-positive sperm showed no halo after Diff-Quik staining. However, in some sperm cells, DNA damage was detected by the SCD test but not by the TUNEL assay. Conclusion(s): Sperm chromatin dispersion test and TUNEL assay are both effective in detecting sperm DNA damage. Using bright-field microscopy, the SCD test appears to be more sensitive than the TUNEL assay. (Fertil Steril (R) 2010; 94: 1027-32. (C) 2010 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1027 / 1032
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Reactive oxygen species as an independent marker of male factor infertility [J].
Agarwal, Ashok ;
Sharma, Rakesh K. ;
Nallella, Kiran P. ;
Thomas, Anthony J., Jr. ;
Alvarez, Juan G. ;
Sikka, Suresh C. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 (04) :878-885
[2]   Relative impact of oxidative stress on the functional competence and genomic integrity of human spermatozoa [J].
Aitken, RJ ;
Gordon, E ;
Harkiss, D ;
Twigg, JP ;
Milne, P ;
Jennings, Z ;
Irvine, DS .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 1998, 59 (05) :1037-1046
[3]   Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive of the outcome of ART [J].
Alvarez, Juan G. ;
Lewis, Sheena .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (05) :1235-1236
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction
[5]  
Baccetti B, 1996, J SUBMICR CYTOL PATH, V28, P587
[6]   Sperm deoxyribonucleic acid fragmentation as a prognostic indicator of assisted reproductive technology outcome [J].
Benchaib, Mehdi ;
Lornage, Jacqueline ;
Mazoyer, Claire ;
Lejeune, Herve ;
Salle, Bruno ;
Guerin, Jean Francois .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2007, 87 (01) :93-100
[7]   Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART [J].
Bungum, Mona ;
Spano, Marcello ;
Humaidan, Peter ;
Eleuteri, Patrizia ;
Rescia, Michele ;
Giwercman, Aleksander .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2008, 23 (01) :4-10
[8]   Comparison of chromatin assays for DNA fragmentation evaluation in human sperm [J].
Chohan, KR ;
Griffin, JT ;
Lafromboise, M ;
De Jonge, CJ ;
Carrell, DT .
JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2006, 27 (01) :53-59
[9]   Do sperm DNA integrity tests predict pregnancy with in vitro fertilization? [J].
Collins, John A. ;
Barnhart, Kurt T. ;
Schlegel, Peter N. .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (04) :823-831
[10]   A logistic regression model including DNA status and morphology of spermatozoa for prediction of fertilization in vitro [J].
Duran, EH ;
Gürgan, T ;
Günalp, S ;
Enginsu, ME ;
Yarali, H ;
Ayhan, A .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (05) :1235-1239