Eysenck's BIG THREE and communication traits: Three correlational studies

被引:76
作者
McCroskey, JC [1 ]
Heisel, AD
Richmond, VP
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Morgantown, WV 26505 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, St Louis, MO 63121 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/03637750128068
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Over the past decade, communication scholars have increasingly considered biological contributions to the ways in which we communicate. One approach to exploring the links between biology and communication involves analysis of relationships between communication variables and variables containing strong biological underpinnings. The present study was designed to provide an examination of the relationship between Eysenck's personality dimensions and communication variables. This essay reports the results of three separate studies that encompass more than a dozen communication variables. The results seem to indicate that non-neurotic extraverts are not shy or apprehensive about touch, tend to perceive themselves as more competent, view themselves as assertive and responsive, and express greater degrees of self-acceptance. Neurotic introverts report apprehension about communication, perceive themselves as less immediate, rate themselves as having a lower affect orientation, and somewhat higher levels of verbal aggressiveness. Neurotic participants report less self-acceptance. Neurotic non-psychotics report a greater degree of affect orientation, more apprehension about communication, and lower verbal aggression. Neurotic psychotic extraverts tend to be compulsive communicators and report greater tolerance for disagreement. Psychotics are non-responsive, and tend to report higher levels of verbal aggressiveness, argumentativeness and assertiveness. Finally, psychotic non-neurotics tend to have a greater tolerance for disagreement and are less likely to identify themselves as compulsive communicators. Possible directions for future research are suggested.
引用
收藏
页码:360 / 366
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Bates J.E., 1989, TEMPERAMENT CHILDHOO, P3
[2]   Communication apprehension as temperamental expression: A communibiological paradigm [J].
Beatty, MJ ;
McCroskey, JC ;
Heisel, AD .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1998, 65 (03) :197-219
[3]  
BEATTY MJ, 2001, BIOL COMMUNICATION C
[4]   THE RELATION BETWEEN EXPRESSED ACCEPTANCE OF SELF AND EXPRESSED ACCEPTANCE OF OTHERS [J].
BERGER, EM .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1952, 47 (04) :778-782
[5]   CONCEPTUALIZING AFFECT AS INFORMATION IN COMMUNICATION PRODUCTION [J].
BOOTHBUTTERFIELD, M ;
BOOTHBUTTERFIELD, S .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1990, 16 (04) :451-476
[6]  
Cappella J. N., 1991, COMMUN THEORY, V1, P4, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1468-2885.1991.TB00002.X
[7]  
CAPPELLA JN, 1993, J LANG SOC PSYCHOL, V12, P3
[8]  
Eysenck H.J., 1947, DIMENSIONS PERSONALI, DOI 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00236-1
[9]  
Eysenck H. J., 1985, Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach, DOI 13877
[10]  
Eysenck H.J., 1990, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, P244