Measurement uncertainty for clinical laboratories - a revision of the concept

被引:21
作者
Jones, Graham Ross Dallas [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp, Dept Chem Pathol, SydPath, Victoria St, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia
关键词
measurement uncertainty; result interpretation; traceability; DEFINITION;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2016-0311
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
The uncertainty of a measurement result is a fundamental concept in metrology indicating the range within the "true" value of a measurement should lie. Although not commonly reported with results, the calculation of measurement uncertainty (MU) has become common in routine clinical laboratories. Interpretation of numerical pathology results is made by comparison with data from other measurements. As MU is aimed at assisting with result interpretation, it should be related to the specific comparison being made. There are three basic type of comparators: a previous result from the same patient, a population reference interval, or a clinical decision point. For each comparison, the "true" value is that which would have been obtained from the instrument used to make the comparator measurements if it was measured without uncertainty. The MU is the range of likely deviations from this true value due to the method used to produce the result under interpretation. For patient monitoring, if the two measurements were made on the same analyzer, the uncertainty is the imprecision of the assay over the relevant time frame. In comparing with a manufacturer-specific reference interval, the MU is deviation from the manufacturer's master calibrator. For clinical decision points produced with the assays traceable to international references, the MU is related to deviation from that reference standard. For optimal use of MU in the clinical laboratory, it may be necessary to consider the use of the test result and the concept of a single MU for each result may need to be revised.
引用
收藏
页码:1303 / 1307
页数:5
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]   13. Diabetes Care in the Hospital [J].
不详 .
DIABETES CARE, 2016, 39 :S99-S104
[2]  
[Anonymous], JCGM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Medical laboratories-requirements for quality and competence
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2007, REQ EST MEAS UNC
[5]   Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group [J].
Bellomo, R ;
Ronco, C ;
Kellum, JA ;
Mehta, RL ;
Palevsky, P .
CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (04) :R204-R212
[6]  
Fraser CG, 2012, CLIN CHEM LAB MED, V50, P807, DOI 10.1515/CCLM.2011.733
[7]  
Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology, 2008, Evaluation of measurement data-Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement
[8]   The Joint Committee for Traceability in Laboratory Medicine (JCTLM) - its history and operation [J].
Jones, Graham R. D. ;
Jackson, Craig .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2016, 453 :86-94
[9]   Validating common reference intervals in routine laboratories [J].
Jones, Graham Ross Dallas .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2014, 432 :119-121
[10]  
Levin A, 2013, KIDNEY INT SUPPL, V3, P5, DOI [10.1038/ki.2013.91, 10.1038/kisup.2012.77]