Safety of concurrent sleeve gastrectomy and hiatal hernia repair: a propensity score-matched analysis of the MBSAQIP registry

被引:18
作者
Janik, Michal R. [1 ,2 ]
Ibikunle, Christopher [3 ,4 ]
Aryaie, Amir H. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Bariatr Ctr Excellence, Lubbock, TX 79430 USA
[2] Mil Inst Med, Dept Gen Oncol Metab & Thorac Surg, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Georgia SurgiCare, Bariatr & Reflux Ctr, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Med Coll Georgia, Augusta, GA 30912 USA
关键词
Hiatal hernia; Bariatric surgery; Sleeve gastrectomy; MBSAQIP; Gastroesophageal reflux disease; GERD; Obesity; BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS; EFFECT SIZE; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2019.12.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Hiatal hernia repair is an essential step to reduce the incidence of gastroesophageal acid reflux disease in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy. The safety of addition, a hiatal hernia repair to sleeve gastrectomy, is a critical question. Objectives: Our study aimed to assess the safety of concurrent hiatal hernia repair and sleeve gastrectomy based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program data. Setting: University health network, United States. Methods: This study was a registry-based analysis. Preoperative characteristics and 30-day outcomes from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Files 2015 to 2017 were selected for all patients who underwent sleeve gastrectomy with hiatal hernia repair. Propensity score matching (1:1) was used to control for potential confounding. Results: A total of 101,902 patients (50,951 patients matched pairs) were included in the study. The groups were closely matched as intended. Sleeve gastrectomy with hiatal hernia repair, compared with sleeve gastrectomy alone, was associated with similar risks of death (.02% versus .02%; relative risk [RR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], .61-3.67, P = .503), and higher risk of 30-day readmission (4.01% versus 2.96%; RR, 1.35; 95%CI, 1.27-1.45, P < .001), 30-day reoperation (1.10% versus.77%; RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.25-1.61, P < .001), 30-day intervention (1.24% versus .95%; RR, 1.31; 95%CI, 1.16-1.47, P < .001), and 30-day morbidity (1.85% versus 1.47%; RR, 1.25; 95%CI, 1.14-1.38, P < .001). Conclusions: Sleeve gastrectomy with hiatal hernia repair is relatively safe in the short term with no increase in the risk of mortality. However, this additional procedure slightly increases the risk of readmission, reoperation, and postoperative intervention, as well as morbidity. (C) 2020 American Society for Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 371
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] 2014: The Year of the Sleeve Supremacy
    Angrisani, Luigi
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (06) : 1626 - 1627
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, PLOS MED
  • [3] Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Concomitant Hiatal Hernia Repair: an Unresolved Question
    Aridi, Hanaa Dakour
    Asali, Mohammad
    Fouani, Tarek
    Alami, Ramzi S.
    Safadi, Bassem Y.
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (11) : 2898 - 2904
  • [4] Concomitant hiatal hernia repair with laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is safe: analysis of the ACS-NSQIP database
    Aridi, Hanaa N. Dakour
    Tamim, Hani
    Mailhac, Aurelie
    Safadi, Bassem Y.
    [J]. SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2017, 13 (03) : 379 - 384
  • [5] Sleeve gastrectomy and the risk of leak: a systematic analysis of 4,888 patients
    Aurora, Alexander R.
    Khaitan, Leena
    Saber, Alan A.
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2012, 26 (06): : 1509 - 1515
  • [6] The Impact of Different Surgical Techniques on Outcomes in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomies The First Report from the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP)
    Berger, Elizabeth R.
    Clements, Ronald H.
    Morton, John M.
    Huffman, Kristopher M.
    Wolfe, Bruce M.
    Nguyen, Ninh T.
    Ko, Clifford Y.
    Hutter, Matthew M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 264 (03) : 464 - 473
  • [7] DOCIMO S, 2017, J AM COLL SURGEON S2, V225, pE
  • [8] A New Algorithm to Reduce the Incidence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Symptoms after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.
    Ece, Ilhan
    Yilmaz, Huseyin
    Acar, Fahrettin
    Colak, Bayram
    Yormaz, Serdar
    Sahin, Mustafa
    [J]. OBESITY SURGERY, 2017, 27 (06) : 1460 - 1465
  • [9] Esophageal adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus after sleeve gastrectomy: Case report and literature review
    El Khoury, Lionel
    Benvenga, Rosa
    Romero, Rodolfo
    Cohen, Regis
    Roussel, Joel
    Catheline, Jean-Marc
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY CASE REPORTS, 2018, 52 : 132 - 136