An Interactive Territory Defining Evolutionary Algorithm: iTDEA

被引:50
作者
Koksalan, Murat [1 ]
Karahan, Ibrahim [2 ]
机构
[1] Middle E Tech Univ, Dept Ind Engn, TR-06531 Ankara, Turkey
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Evolutionary algorithms; guidance; interactive; multiobjective optimization; preference incorporation; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; COMPUTATION; PREFERENCES; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/TEVC.2010.2070070
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We develop a preference-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm that interacts with the decision maker (DM) during the course of optimization. We create a territory around each solution where no other solutions are allowed. We define smaller territories around the preferred solutions in order to obtain denser coverage of these regions. At each interaction, the algorithm asks the DM to choose his/her best solution among a set of representative solutions to guide the search toward the neighborhood of the selected solution. The algorithm aims to converge to a final preferred region of the DM. We test the algorithm on three problems using three different utility function types to simulate the DM's responses. The results show that the algorithm converges the DM's simulated preferred regions well.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 722
页数:21
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   An economical cognitive approach for bi-objective optimization using bliss points, visualization, and interaction [J].
Abbass, HA .
SOFT COMPUTING, 2006, 10 (08) :687-698
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems (Genetic and Evolutionary Computation)
[3]   SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume [J].
Beume, Nicola ;
Naujoks, Boris ;
Emmerich, Michael .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (03) :1653-1669
[4]   Guidance in evolutionary multi-objective optimization [J].
Branke, J ;
Kaussler, T ;
Schmeck, H .
ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 2001, 32 (06) :499-507
[5]  
Branke J, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5467, P554, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-01020-0_43
[6]   A COMPARATIVE-EVALUATION OF INTERACTIVE SOLUTION METHODS FOR MULTIPLE OBJECTIVE DECISION-MODELS [J].
BUCHANAN, JT ;
DAELLENBACH, HG .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1987, 29 (03) :353-359
[7]  
Coello CAC, 2000, IEEE C EVOL COMPUTAT, P30, DOI 10.1109/CEC.2000.870272
[8]  
CORNE DW, 2001, P GECCO, V7, P283
[9]   Preferences and their application in evolutionary multiobjective optimization [J].
Cvetkovic, D ;
Parmee, IC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2002, 6 (01) :42-57
[10]   Evaluating the ε-domination based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for a quick computation of pareto-optimal solutions [J].
Deb, K ;
Mohan, M ;
Mishra, S .
EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2005, 13 (04) :501-525