Energy Conversion and Partition in the Asymmetric Reconnection Diffusion Region

被引:20
作者
Wang, Shan [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Li-Jen [1 ,2 ]
Bessho, Naoki [1 ,2 ]
Hesse, Michael [3 ,4 ]
Yoo, Jongsoo [5 ]
Yamada, Masaaki [5 ]
Liu, Yi-Hsin [6 ]
Gershman, Danial J. [2 ]
Giles, Barbara L. [2 ]
Moore, Thomas E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Astron Dept, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[3] Univ Bergen, Dept Phys & Technol, Bergen, Norway
[4] Southwest Res Inst San Antonio, San Antonio, TX USA
[5] Princeton Plasma Phys Lab, POB 451, Princeton, NJ 08543 USA
[6] Dartmouth Coll, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
COLLISIONLESS MAGNETIC RECONNECTION; EARTHS MAGNETOPAUSE DEPENDENCE; INFLOW ALFVEN SPEED; GUIDE-FIELD; ELECTRON ENERGIZATION; ION DIFFUSION; ACCELERATION; MMS; MECHANISM; COMPONENT;
D O I
10.1029/2018JA025519
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We investigate the energy conversion and partition in the asymmetric reconnection diffusion region using two-dimensional particle-in-cell simulations and Magnetosphere Multiscale (MMS) mission observations. Under an upstream condition with equal temperatures in the two inflow regions, the simulation analysis indicates that the energy partition between ions and electrons depends on the distance from the X-line. Within the central electron diffusion region (EDR), nearly all dissipated electromagnetic field energies are converted to electrons. From the EDR to the ion diffusion region (IDR) scales, the rate of the electron energy gain decreases to be lower than that of ions. A magnetopause reconnection event inside the IDR observed by MMS shows comparable ion and electron energy gains, consistent with the simulation result in the transition region from EDR to IDR. At the EDR scale, the electron energization is mainly by the reconnection electric field (E-r); in-plane electric fields (E-xz) provide additional positive contributions near the X-line and do negative work on electrons beyond the EDR. The guide field reduces the electron energization by both E-r and E-xz in the EDR. For ion energization, E-r and E-xz have comparable contributions near the time of the peak reconnection rate, while E-xz dominants at later time. At the IDR scale, the guide field causes asymmetry in the amount of the energy gain and energization mechanisms between two exhausts but does not have significant effects on energy partition. Our study advances understanding of ion and electron energization in asymmetric reconnect IDRs.
引用
收藏
页码:8185 / 8205
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Magnetospheric Multiscale Observations of the Electron Diffusion Region of Large Guide Field Magnetic Reconnection
    Eriksson, S.
    Wilder, F. D.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Schwartz, S. J.
    Cassak, P. A.
    Burch, J. L.
    Chen, L. -J.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Phan, T. D.
    Lavraud, B.
    Goodrich, K. A.
    Holmes, J. C.
    Stawarz, J. E.
    Sturner, A. P.
    Malaspina, D. M.
    Usanova, M. E.
    Trattner, K. J.
    Strangeway, R. J.
    Russell, C. T.
    Pollock, C. J.
    Giles, B. L.
    Hesse, M.
    Lindqvist, P. -A.
    Drake, J. F.
    Shay, M. A.
    Nakamura, R.
    Marklund, G. T.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2016, 117 (01)
  • [42] "Ambipolar diffusion" and magnetic reconnection
    Tsap, Yuriy T.
    Stepanov, Alexander V.
    ADVANCES IN PLASMA ASTROPHYSICS, 2011, (274): : 302 - 305
  • [43] Ambipolar Diffusion and Magnetic Reconnection
    Tsap, Yu. T.
    Stepanov, A. V.
    Kopylova, Yu. G.
    ASTRONOMY REPORTS, 2012, 56 (02) : 138 - 145
  • [44] Electron energization and thermal to non-thermal energy partition during earth's magnetotail reconnection
    Oka, M.
    Phan, T. D.
    Oieroset, M.
    Turner, D. L.
    Drake, J. F.
    Li, X.
    Fuselier, S. A.
    Gershman, D. J.
    Giles, B. L.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Wei, H. Y.
    Strangeway, R. J.
    Russell, C. T.
    Burch, J. L.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2022, 29 (05)
  • [45] Effects of Guide Field and Background Density and Temperature on Energy Conversion at Magnetic Reconnection Front
    Shu, Yukang
    Lu, San
    Lu, Quanming
    Wang, Rongsheng
    Zheng, Jian
    Ding, Weixing
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2022, 127 (09)
  • [46] Numerical study of energy conversion mechanism of magnetic reconnection in the presence of high guide field
    Inoue, S.
    Ono, Y.
    Tanabe, H.
    Horiuchi, R.
    Cheng, C. Z.
    NUCLEAR FUSION, 2015, 55 (08)
  • [47] Electron diffusion region during magnetopause reconnection with an intermediate guide field: Magnetospheric multiscale observations
    Chen, L. -J.
    Hesse, M.
    Wang, S.
    Gershman, D.
    Ergun, R. E.
    Burch, J.
    Bessho, N.
    Torbert, R. B.
    Giles, B.
    Webster, J.
    Pollock, C.
    Dorelli, J.
    Moore, T.
    Paterson, W.
    Lavraud, B.
    Strangeway, R.
    Russell, C.
    Khotyaintsev, Y.
    Lindqvist, P. -A.
    Avanov, L.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2017, 122 (05) : 5235 - 5246
  • [48] Reconnection Front Associated with Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection: Particle-in-cell Simulations
    Song, Liangjin
    Zhou, Meng
    Yi, Yongyuan
    Deng, Xiaohua
    Zhong, Zhihong
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2019, 881 (01)
  • [49] On the origin of "patchy" energy conversion in electron diffusion regions
    Genestreti, Kevin J.
    Li, Xiaocan
    Liu, Yi-Hsin
    Burch, James L.
    Torbert, Roy B.
    Fuselier, Stephen A.
    Nakamura, Takuma
    Giles, Barbara L.
    Gershman, Daniel J.
    Ergun, Robert E.
    Russell, Christopher T.
    Strangeway, Robert J.
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2022, 29 (08)
  • [50] Energy Conversion in the Dip Region Preceding Dipolarization Front
    Zhao, B. N.
    Liu, C. M.
    Cao, J. B.
    Liu, Y. Y.
    Xing, X. N.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 51 (13)