Mass-like peripheral zone enhancement on CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4+3 and higher) prostate cancer

被引:7
作者
Glazer, D. I. [1 ]
Davenport, M. S. [1 ]
Khalatbari, S. [2 ]
Cohan, R. H. [1 ]
Ellis, J. H. [1 ]
Caoili, E. M. [1 ]
Stein, E. B. [1 ]
Childress, J. C. [1 ]
Masch, W. R. [1 ]
Brown, J. M. [1 ]
Mollard, B. J. [1 ]
Montgomery, J. S. [3 ]
Palapattu, G. S. [3 ]
Francis, I. R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Michigan Inst Clin & Hlth Res, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[3] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Dept Urol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
ABDOMINAL IMAGING | 2015年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
Prostate cancer; CT; Peripheral zone; Repeatability; Likelihood ratio; LOCALIZATION; PERSPECTIVE; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-014-0233-7
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
To determine whether focal peripheral zone enhancement on routine venous-phase CT is predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer. IRB approval was obtained and informed consent waived for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Forty-three patients with higher-grade prostate cancer (a parts per thousand yenGleason 4 + 3) and 96 with histology-confirmed lower-grade (a parts per thousand currency signGleason 3 + 4 [n = 47]) or absent (n = 49) prostate cancer imaged with venous-phase CT comprised the study population. CT images were reviewed by ten blinded radiologists (5 attendings, 5 residents) who scored peripheral zone enhancement on a scale of 1 (benign) to 5 (malignant). Mass-like peripheral zone enhancement was considered malignant. Likelihood ratios (LR) and specificities were calculated. Multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses were conducted. Scores of "5" were strongly predictive of higher-grade prostate cancer (pooled LR+ 9.6 [95% CI 5.8-15.8]) with rare false positives (pooled specificity: 0.98 [942/960, 95% CI 0.98-0.99]; all 10 readers had specificity a parts per thousand yen95%). Attending scores of "5" were more predictive than resident scores of "5" (LR+: 14.7 [95% CI 5.8-37.2] vs. 7.6 [95% CI 4.2-13.7]) with similar specificity (0.99 [475/480, 95% CI 0.98-1.00] vs. 0.97 [467/480, 95% CI 0.96-0.99]). Significant predictors of an assigned score of "5" included presence of a peripheral zone mass (p < 0.0001), larger size (p < 0.0001), and less reader experience (p = 0.0008). Significant predictors of higher-grade prostate cancer included presence of a peripheral zone mass (p = 0.0002) and larger size (p < 0.0001). Focal mass-like peripheral zone enhancement on routine venous-phase CT is specific and predictive of higher-grade (Gleason 4 + 3 and higher) prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:560 / 570
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Richenberg, Jonathan ;
Clements, Richard ;
Choyke, Peter ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Villeirs, Geert ;
Rouviere, Olivier ;
Logager, Vibeke ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) :746-757
[2]   THE ROLE OF IMAGING IN SCREENING FOR PROSTATE-CANCER - A DECISION-ANALYSIS PERSPECTIVE [J].
CHANG, P ;
FRIEDLAND, GW .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (05) :591-595
[3]   PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA BY COMPUTERIZED-TOMOGRAPHY - WEAKNESSES AND NEW PERSPECTIVES [J].
ENGELER, CE ;
WASSERMAN, NF ;
ZHANG, G .
UROLOGY, 1992, 40 (04) :346-350
[4]   Transition Zone Prostate Cancer: Detection and Localization with 3-T Multiparametric MR Imaging [J].
Hoeks, Caroline M. A. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Yakar, Derya ;
de Kaa, Christina A. Hulsbergen-van ;
Feuth, Ton ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Futterer, Jurgen J. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. .
RADIOLOGY, 2013, 266 (01) :207-217
[5]   Prostate Cancer: Multiparametric MR Imaging for Detection, Localization, and Staging [J].
Hoeks, Caroline M. A. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Hambrock, Thomas ;
Yakar, Derya ;
Somford, Diederik M. ;
Heijmink, Stijn W. T. P. J. ;
Scheenen, Tom W. J. ;
Vos, Pieter C. ;
Huisman, Henkjan ;
van Oort, Inge M. ;
Witjes, J. Alfred ;
Heerschap, Arend ;
Fuetterer, Jurgen J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 261 (01) :46-66
[6]   Imaging prostate cancer: A multidisciplinary perspective [J].
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Eberhardt, Steven C. ;
Leibel, Steven A. ;
Scardino, Peter T. .
RADIOLOGY, 2007, 243 (01) :28-53
[7]  
Mikuz G, 2007, CLIN PATHOLOGY UROLO
[8]   Update on the appropriate staging evaluation for newly diagnosed prostate cancer [J].
ODowd, GJ ;
Veltri, RW ;
Orozco, R ;
Miller, MC ;
Oesterling, JE .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (03) :687-698
[9]   THE ACCURACY OF CT IN THE STAGING OF CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
PLATT, JF ;
BREE, RL ;
SCHWAB, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 149 (02) :315-318
[10]   Imaging clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Purohit, RS ;
Shinohara, K ;
Meng, MV ;
Carroll, PR .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 30 (02) :279-+