Comprehensive evaluation of environ-economic benefits of anaerobic digestion technology in an integrated food waste-based methane plant using a fuzzy mathematical model

被引:45
作者
Chen, Ting [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Dongsheng [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Yiying [3 ]
Li, Hailong [4 ]
Yu, Zhixin [5 ]
Feng, Huajun [1 ,2 ]
Long, Yuyang [1 ,2 ]
Yin, Jun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Environm Sci & Engn, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Prov Key Lab Solid Waste Treatment & Rec, Hangzhou 310012, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[4] Malardalen Univ, Sch Sustainable Dev Soc & Technol, SE-72123 Vasteras, Sweden
[5] Univ Stavanger, Dept Petr Engn, N-4036 Stavanger, Norway
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fuzzy model; Anaerobic fermentation; Food waste; Environmental benefits; Economic benefits; LIFE-CYCLE; KITCHEN WASTE; HYDROTHERMAL TREATMENT; THERMAL PRETREATMENT; MANAGEMENT-SYSTEMS; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; CO-DIGESTION; LCA; GENERATION; VALUATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.09.082
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
In this study, a quantitative and comprehensive evaluation of environ-economic benefits of anaerobic digestion (AD) of food waste was conducted on an operational project in China. Fuzzy evaluation method based on life cycle assessment and cost-benefit analysis was employed. Single-factor evaluation of environmental impacts and energy consumption indicated that AD was a green and clean energy producing technology. The study indicated that the total environmental impact was not significant at 6.65 E-03, and the net energy output (186.01 MJ) was slightly higher than the net energy input (167.47 MJ), when only methane production was considered. However, economic benefits were not ideal, recording loss of 64.99 RMB for each ton of food waste. Additionally, results of comprehensive evaluation conducted using fuzzy mathematical model were consistent with above results. Environmental benefits, energy consumption, and economic benefits of AD technology were 4.75, 3.58, and 1.36, corresponding to grades I, ?, and IV, respectively. Single benefits decreased in the order of environmental impact > energy consumption > economic benefit, indicating that economic benefit is the restrictive factor in integrated environ-economic benefits of AD technology in practice. Thus, increasing economic benefit should be the focus of research and management processes. Additionally, overall environ-economic benefit of AD rated good (Grade II), with a value of 3.39. Further sensitivity analysis results confirmed the stability of the comprehensive evaluation model. The established fuzzy mathematical evaluation model can realize comprehensive and quantitative evaluation of environ-economic benefits of AD technology; serve as valuable reference for perfecting evaluation systems, and assist in rational choice of renewable energy recovery technology from food waste.
引用
收藏
页码:666 / 677
页数:12
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Agency for Renewable Resources (FEB), 2006, FEED BIOG GAS NETW
[2]   Agricultural anaerobic digestion plants: What LCA studies pointed out and what can be done to make them more environmentally sustainable [J].
Bacenetti, Jacopo ;
Sala, Cesare ;
Fusi, Alessandra ;
Fiala, Marco .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 179 :669-686
[3]   Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems - Current status and potential improvements [J].
Bernstad, A. ;
Jansen, J. la Cour .
WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (12) :2439-2455
[4]   A fuzzy model for the valuation of quality management system [J].
Brotons, Jose M. ;
Sansalvador, Manuel E. .
KYBERNETES, 2017, 46 (01) :157-171
[5]   Quantitative risk assessment model of tunnel construction under passing existing bridges [J].
Chen, Jiejin ;
Zhang, Yongjie .
Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2015, 46 (05) :1862-1868
[6]   Fuzzy decision making systems based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets [J].
Chen, Shyi-Ming ;
Wang, Cheng-Yi .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2013, 242 :1-21
[7]   A hybrid fuzzy evaluation method for safety assessment of food-waste feed based on entropy and the analytic hierarchy process methods [J].
Chen, Ting ;
Jin, Yiying ;
Qiu, Xiaopeng ;
Chen, Xin .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (16) :7328-7337
[8]   Effect of hydrothermal treatment on the levels of selected indigenous microbes in food waste [J].
Chen, Ting ;
Jin, Yiying ;
Liu, Fuqiang ;
Meng, Xiao ;
Li, Huan ;
Nie, Yongfeng .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 106 :17-21
[9]   A FUZZY MULTIPLE CRITERIA COMPARISON OF TECHNOLOGY VALUATION METHODS FOR THE NEW MATERIALS DEVELOPMENT [J].
Cheng, An-Chin .
TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2013, 19 (03) :397-408
[10]   Supplier selection using AHP methodology extended by D numbers [J].
Deng, Xinyang ;
Hu, Yong ;
Deng, Yong ;
Mahadevan, Sankaran .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (01) :156-167