Tree species composition and management influence short-term resilience to defoliation by Lymantria dispar L. in oak forests

The frequency and intensity of natural disturbances such as infestations by forest insect pests are expected to increase under a scenario of climate change. Thus, tools for monitoring the impact of these disturbance events at large spatial scales are required, together with appropriate management practices for enhancing the ability of forest ecosystems to overcome affectations by insect pests. Here, we used the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) combined with 'ground truth' measurements to assess the effects of tree species diversity and forest management on the resistance, recovery and short-term (two years) resilience in mixed oak forests after a severe Lymantria dispar L. defoliation episode. Our results showed that, although neither diversity nor management influenced forest resistance to defoliation, both factors interacted and influenced EVI recovery after the disturbance event. This interaction revealed the complex role tree diversity plays in increasing (in managed forests) or decreasing (in unmanaged forests) resilience to defoliation, thereby suggesting that tree species composition may be more relevant than tree species diversity per se. Indeed, in the field we observed a variety of species-specific degrees of defoliation (e.g. higher in Quercus ilex L.), as well as the preference of L. dispar adults for ovipositing in unmanaged areas and on particular trees (Arbutus unedo L.) that were barely defoliated. In addition, we also found significant and positive effects of tree size (dbh) on avoiding defoliation damage. We thus make three management recommendations for increasing the resilience of oak forests to L. dispar defoliation: i) the application of continuous-cover silviculture (30% thinning intensity in basal areas), ii) the retention of larger trees, and iii) the maintenance of a preferential combination of tree species in mixed stands (e.g. Q. suber and Q. pubescens).