Engendering New Labour's workfarist regime:: Exploring the intersection of welfare state restructuring and labour market policies in the UK

被引:20
作者
Macleavy, Julie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Geog Sci, Bristol BS8 1SS, Avon, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
welfare; workfare; women; new labour; new deal for the unemployed;
D O I
10.1080/09663690701659283
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
This article deconstructs New Labour's emerging workfarist regime to reveal the complex and contradictory gender relations embodied in and through its work-welfare policy. Starting from the decline of manufacturing employment within the UK, it traces the deregulation of the labour market and the range of structural and social changes initiated by this process. Noting, in particular, how the feminisation of the economy' is connected to the changing characteristics of employment and women's socio-economic positions, the article identifies the manner in which the growing labour market participation of women is serving to (further) entrench gender inequality. Against this background, it proceeds to raise issues regarding the increased expectation to enter the labour market observed within programmes such as the New Deal for the Unemployed, which stipulates that the receipt of state benefits ought now to require a labour input. The crux of analysis is on the policy and political discourses that award priority to paid work in the formal tabour market, whilst simultaneously neglecting the gendered divisions of labour around unwaged care work and domestic tasks. In suggesting that gender remains a key from of political-economic organisation in the contemporary period of after-Fordism, this article argues that (further) attention must be given to the ways in which its socially constructed properties are manifest within work-welfare policy and the ramifications of this embedding for social and economic equality.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 743
页数:23
相关论文
共 128 条
[41]   Job deficits in UK regions [J].
Erdem, E ;
Glyn, A .
OXFORD BULLETIN OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2001, 63 :737-752
[42]  
Esping-Andersen G., 1990, 3 WORLDS WELFARE CAP, DOI DOI 10.1177/095892879100100108
[43]  
Estevez-Abe M., 2001, Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, P145, DOI [10.1093/0199247757.003.0004, DOI 10.1093/0199247757.003.0004]
[44]  
*EUR FDN IMPR LIV, 2002, TEMP AG WORK NAT REP
[45]  
Fairclough, 1995, CRITICAL DISCOURSE A
[46]  
Fairclough N., 2002, METHODS CRITICAL DIS, P121, DOI DOI 10.4135/9780857028020
[47]  
Fairclough N., 2003, Political Discourse Analysis: A Method for Advanced Students, DOI [DOI 10.1016/J.ACTAMAT.2005.01.043, DOI 10.4324/9780203697078, 10.4324/9780203697078]
[48]  
Fairclough Norman., 2000, NEW LABOUR NEW LANGU
[49]  
Gershuny J., 2000, Changing Times: Work and Leisure in Postindustrial Society
[50]   Feminist fallacies: A reply [J].
Ginn, J ;
Arber, S ;
Brannen, J ;
Dale, A ;
Dex, S ;
Elias, P ;
Moss, P ;
Pahl, J ;
Roberts, C ;
Rubery, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1996, 47 (01) :167-174