Will Improvements in Patient Experience With Care Impact Clinical and Quality of Care Outcomes? A Systematic Review

被引:20
|
作者
Navarro, Stephanie [1 ]
Ochoa, Carol Y. [1 ]
Chan, Emily [1 ]
Du, Senxi [1 ]
Farias, Albert J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Prevent Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
关键词
patient experiences; Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems; quality improvement; HEALTH-CARE; HOSPITAL QUALITY; COMMUNICATION; ASSOCIATIONS; NONRESPONSE; RATINGS; CAHPS; ADHERENCE; DIFFER; PLANS;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0000000000001598
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patient experiences with health care have been widely used as benchmark indicators of quality for providers, health care practices, and health plans. Objective: The objective of this study was to summarize the literature regarding the associations between Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) patient experiences and clinical and quality outcomes. Research Design: A systematic review of the literature was completed using PubMed, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature on December 14, 2019. Separate searches were conducted to query terms identifying CAHPS surveys with clinical and quality outcomes of care. Two reviewers completed all components of the search process. Study Selection: Studies investigating associations between CAHPS composite ratings and health care sensitive clinical outcomes or quality measures of care were included in this review. Studies were excluded if they did not investigate patient experiences using CAHPS composite ratings or if CAHPS composites were not treated as the independent variable. Results: Nineteen studies met inclusion criteria, 10 investigating associations of CAHPS composite ratings with clinical outcomes and 9 investigating these associations with quality measures. Patient-provider communication was the most studied CAHPS composite rating and was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health, frequency of emergency room visits and inpatient hospital stays, hospitalization length, and CAHPS personal physician global ratings. Conclusions: Ratings of patient experience with care may influence clinical and quality outcomes of care. However, key inconsistencies between studies affirm that more research is needed to solidify this conclusion and investigate how patient experiences differentially relate to outcomes for various patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 856
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Organizational and Service Management Interventions for Improving the Patient Experience With Care: Systematic Review of the Effectiveness
    Jesus, Tiago S.
    Lee, Dongwook
    Zhang, Manrui
    Stern, Brocha Z.
    Struhar, Jan
    Heinemann, Allen W.
    Jordan, Neil
    Deutsch, Anne
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2025,
  • [22] Impact of Synchronous Telemedicine Models on Clinical Outcomes in Pediatric Acute Care Settings: A Systematic Review*
    Nadar, Mahmoud
    Jouvet, Philippe
    Tucci, Marisa
    Toledano, Baruch
    Sicotte, Claude
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12) : E662 - E671
  • [23] Patient satisfaction and experience of primary care in Saudi Arabia: a systematic review
    Senitan, Mohammed
    Alhaiti, Ali Hassan
    Gillespie, James
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2018, 30 (10) : 751 - 759
  • [24] Patient-Reported Experience Measures in Stroke Care A Systematic Review
    Cornelis, Cosette
    den Hartog, Sanne J.
    Bastemeijer, Carla M.
    Roozenbeek, Bob
    Nederkoorn, Paul J.
    Van den Berg-vos, Renske M.
    STROKE, 2021, 52 (07) : 2432 - 2435
  • [25] Cognitive and affective reassurance and patient outcomes in primary care: A systematic review
    Pincus, Tamar
    Holt, Nicola
    Vogel, Steven
    Underwood, Martin
    Savage, Richard
    Walsh, David Andrew
    Taylor, Stephanie Jane Caroline
    PAIN, 2013, 154 (11) : 2407 - 2416
  • [26] Patient feedback to improve quality of patient-centred care in public hospitals: a systematic review of the evidence
    Wong, Eunice
    Mavondo, Felix
    Fisher, Jane
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [27] Impact of Practice Facilitation in Primary Care on Chronic Disease Care Processes and Outcomes: a Systematic Review
    Andrew Wang
    Teresa Pollack
    Lauren A. Kadziel
    Samuel M. Ross
    Megan McHugh
    Neil Jordan
    Abel N. Kho
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2018, 33 : 1968 - 1977
  • [28] Impact of pharmacist-led interventions on patient care in ambulatory care settings: A systematic review
    Bou Malham, Carmela
    El Khatib, Sarah
    Cestac, Philippe
    Andrieu, Sandrine
    Rouch, Laure
    Salameh, Pascale
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 75 (11)
  • [29] The impact of staff training on staff outcomes in dementia care: a systematic review
    Spector, Aimee
    Revolta, Catherine
    Orrell, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2016, 31 (11) : 1172 - 1187
  • [30] Quality indicators for care of osteoarthritis in primary care settings: a systematic literature review
    Petrosyan, Yelena
    Sahakyan, Yeva
    Barnsley, Jan M.
    Kuluski, Kerry
    Liu, Barbara
    Wodchis, Walter P.
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 35 (02) : 151 - 159