A Dutch version of the Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS): Psychometric properties and validation

被引:14
作者
Hermans, M. [1 ]
Korrelboom, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Visser, S. [4 ]
机构
[1] PsyQ Anxiety Disorders, The Hague, Netherlands
[2] PsyQ Dept Res & Innovat, The Hague, Netherlands
[3] Tilburg Univ, Dept Med & Clin Psychol, Tilburg Sch Social & Behav Sci, NL-5000 LE Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Psychol, NL-1012 WX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Anxiety; Self-report; Assessment; Validity; Principal component analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE; SENSITIVITY INDEX; HOSPITAL ANXIETY; INVENTORY; DEPRESSION; DISORDER; RESILIENCE; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jad.2014.09.033
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) is a 5-item self-report measure that can be used to assess the impact of any anxiety disorder or multiple anxiety disorders. Prior US investigations have shown the OASIS to be a reliable and valid measure. To date the OASIS has not been validated for use in a Dutch sample of anxiety disordered patients. Methods: The present study assessed the psychometric properties of a Dutch version of the OASIS in a clinical sample of anxiety patients. Latent structure, internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, and cutoff score analyses were conducted. Results were compared to those obtained from a clinical sample of patients with psychiatric diagnoses other than anxiety disorders. Results: Principal component analysis supported a unidimensional structure. The five OASIS items loaded strongly on a single factor (eigenvalue=3.682, loadings=.80-.89) which accounted for 73.65% of the variance, and had a high degree of internal consistency (Cronbach's a=91). OASIS scores demonstrated robust correlations with other measures of anxiety, neuroticism and general distress. Correlations with unrelated constructs were weak. Mean score (8.46) and cutoff score of the Dutch sample of anxiety patients were lower than scores previously found in American samples. A cutoff score of 5 correctly classified 82.5% of this sample as having an anxiety disorder diagnosis or not. An improvement of 4 points is indicative of a clinically significant change. Limitations: This study mainly relied on self-report measures in order to assess validity. Other types of measures should be used in future studies. Conclusions: The Dutch version of the OASIS showed good reliability and validity Its brevity and sound psychometric properties make it a good instrument for screening and assessment purposes in the field of anxiety disorders. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 132
页数:6
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1991, Psychological Assessment: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, DOI DOI 10.1037/1040-3590.3.3.433
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2002, STRUCTURED CLIN INTE
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT, DOI DOI 10.1176/APPI.BOOKS.9780890425787
[4]   Toward a unified treatment for emotional disorders [J].
Barlow, DH ;
Allen, LB ;
Choate, ML .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 2004, 35 (02) :205-230
[5]   RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE BECK ANXIETY INVENTORY AND THE HAMILTON ANXIETY RATING-SCALE WITH ANXIOUS OUTPATIENTS [J].
BECK, AT ;
STEER, RA .
JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 1991, 5 (03) :213-223
[6]   AN INVENTORY FOR MEASURING CLINICAL ANXIETY - PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES [J].
BECK, AT ;
BROWN, G ;
EPSTEIN, N ;
STEER, RA .
JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 56 (06) :893-897
[7]  
Brown T. A., 2001, J ABNORM PSYCHOL, V107, P179
[8]   Validation of a brief measure of anxiety-related severity and impairment: The Overall Anxiety Severity and Impairment Scale (OASIS) [J].
Campbell-Sills, Laura ;
Norman, Sonya B. ;
Craske, Michelle G. ;
Sullivan, Greer ;
Lang, Ariel J. ;
Chavira, Denise A. ;
Bystritsky, Alexander ;
Sherbourne, Cathy ;
Roy-Byrne, Peter ;
Stein, Murray B. .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2009, 112 (1-3) :92-101
[9]   COMMON AND SPECIFIC DIMENSIONS OF SELF-REPORTED ANXIETY AND DEPRESSION - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE COGNITIVE AND TRIPARTITE MODELS [J].
CLARK, DA ;
STEER, RA ;
BECK, AT .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 103 (04) :645-654
[10]   Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) [J].
Connor, KM ;
Davidson, JRT .
DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2003, 18 (02) :76-82