A Monte Carlo model for out-of-field dose calculation from high-energy photon therapy

被引:79
作者
Kry, Stephen F. [1 ]
Titt, Uwe
Followill, David
Poenisch, Falk
Vassiliev, Oleg N.
White, R. Allen
Stovall, Marilyn
Salehpour, Mohammad
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Med Fak Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany
[3] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Phys, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostats & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Monte Carlo; out-of-field; peripheral radiation; neutron; dose equivalent;
D O I
10.1118/1.2756940
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
As cancer therapy becomes more efficacious and patients survive longer, the potential for late effects increases, including effects induced by radiation dose delivered away from the treatment site. This out-of-field radiation is of particular concern with high-energy radiotherapy, as neutrons are produced in the accelerator head. We recently developed an accurate Monte Carlo model of a Varian 2100 accelerator using MCNPX for calculating the dose away from the treatment field resulting from low-energy therapy. In this study, we expanded and validated our Monte Carlo model for high-energy (18 MV) photon therapy, including both photons and neutrons. Simulated out-of-field photon doses were compared with measurements made with thermoluminescent dosimeters in an acrylic phantom up to 55 cm from the central axis. Simulated neutron fluences and energy spectra were compared with measurements using moderated gold foil activation in moderators and data from the literature. The average local difference between the calculated and measured photon dose was 17%, including doses as low as 0.01% of the central axis dose. The out-of-field photon dose varied substantially with field size and distance from the edge of the field but varied little with depth in the phantom, except at depths shallower than 3 cm, where the dose sharply increased. On average, the difference between the simulated and measured neutron fluences was 19% and good agreement was observed with the neutron spectra. The neutron dose equivalent varied little with field size or distance from the central axis but decreased with depth in the phantom. Neutrons were the dominant component of the out-of-field dose equivalent for shallow depths and large distances from the edge of the treatment field. This Monte Carlo model is useful to both physicists and clinicians when evaluating out-of-field doses and associated potential risks. (c) 2007 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:3489 / 3499
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]  
NATH R, 1986, 19 AAPM
[32]  
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, 1984, 79 NCRP
[33]  
NCRP, 1993, 116 NCRP
[34]   MCNPX simulation of a multileaf collimator [J].
Pönisch, F ;
Titt, U ;
Kry, SF ;
Vassiliev, ON ;
Mohan, R .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2006, 33 (02) :402-404
[35]   Studies of mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 13: Solid cancer and noncancer disease mortality: 1950-1997 [J].
Preston, DL ;
Shimizu, Y ;
Pierce, DA ;
Suyama, A ;
Mabuchi, K .
RADIATION RESEARCH, 2003, 160 (04) :381-407
[36]   DETERMINATION OF DOSE COMPONENTS IN PHANTOMS IRRADIATED WITH AN EPITHERMAL NEUTRON BEAM FOR BORON NEUTRON-CAPTURE THERAPY [J].
RAAIJMAKERS, CPJ ;
KONIJNENBERG, MW ;
VERHAGEN, HW ;
MIJNHEER, BJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1995, 22 (03) :321-329
[37]   Cancer risks from medical radiation [J].
Ron, E .
HEALTH PHYSICS, 2003, 85 (01) :47-59
[38]   Second primary malignancies in thyroid cancer patients [J].
Rubino, C ;
de Vathaire, F ;
Dottorini, ME ;
Hall, P ;
Schvartz, C ;
Couette, JE ;
Dondon, MG ;
Abbas, MT ;
Langlois, C ;
Schlumberger, M .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (09) :1638-1644
[39]   Long-term risk of second malignant neoplasms after neuroblastoma in childhood:: Role of treatment [J].
Rubino, C ;
Adjadj, E ;
Guérin, S ;
Guibout, C ;
Shamsaldin, A ;
Dondon, MG ;
Valteau-Couanet, D ;
Hartmann, O ;
Hawkins, M ;
de Vathaire, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 107 (05) :791-796
[40]  
SCHUHMACHER H, 1992, RADIAT PROT DOSIM, V40, P85