The role of restoration in the prevention of a large-scale native species loss: Case study of the invasive emerald ash borer

被引:2
作者
Berry, Kevin [1 ]
Finnoff, David C. [2 ]
Horan, Richard D. [3 ]
McDermott, Shana M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alaska Anchorage, Inst Social & Econ Res, Dept Econ & Publ Policy, 3211 Providence Dr, Anchorage, AK 99508 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Coll Business, Dept Econ, 1000 E Univ Ave, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Food & Resource Econ, 446W Circle Dr,Rm 303A,Justin S Morrill Hall Agr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Trinity Univ, Chapman Ctr, Dept Econ, One Trinity Pl, San Antonio, TX 78212 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Invasive species; Prevention; Restoration; Ash trees; Emerald ash borer; AGRILUS-PLANIPENNIS; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; URBAN FOREST; RISK; TREES; ADAPTATION; MITIGATION; STRATEGIES; BENEFITS; SPREAD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfe.2017.03.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Prevention and restoration are two options for minimizing environmental and economic damages caused by invasive species. Prevention lowers the probability of an invasive species arriving. However, once invasive species have invaded an ecosystem, it is rarely economically or physically viable to eradicate them. Policy after invasion then focuses on restoration or returning habitats to their un-invaded states. We determine the optimal prevention of invasion of the emerald ash borer in Colorado, given the timing of invasion is uncertain and that managers may be able to restore the invaded ecosystem upon an invasive species arrival. Results are used to generate a switching frontier where it is optimal to invest (or not) in prevention given combinations of the probability of invasion, effectiveness of prevention efforts, and restoration possibilities. (C) 2017 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 98
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Economic Impacts of Non-Native Forest Insects in the Continental United States [J].
Aukema, Juliann E. ;
Leung, Brian ;
Kovacs, Kent ;
Chivers, Corey ;
Britton, Kerry O. ;
Englin, Jeffrey ;
Frankel, Susan J. ;
Haight, Robert G. ;
Holmes, Thomas P. ;
Liebhold, Andrew M. ;
McCullough, Deborah G. ;
Von Holle, Betsy .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (09)
[2]   Using ecological restoration to constrain biological invasion [J].
Bakker, JD ;
Wilson, SD .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2004, 41 (06) :1058-1064
[3]  
Baranchikov Y., 2008, Bulletin OEPP, V38, P233, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2338.2008.01210.x
[4]  
Berger J.J., 1993, Restoration Ecology, V1, P74, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1526-100X.1993.TB00012.X
[5]  
Borer Emerald Ash, 2009, EMERALD ASH BORER
[6]   Prominent role of invasive species in avian biodiversity loss [J].
Clavero, Miguel ;
Brotons, Lluis ;
Pons, Pere ;
Sol, Daniel .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2009, 142 (10) :2043-2049
[7]  
Clotfelter S., 2013, DENVER POST
[8]   The Relationship Between Trees and Human Health Evidence from the Spread of the Emerald Ash Borer [J].
Donovan, Geoffrey H. ;
Butry, David T. ;
Michael, Yvonne L. ;
Prestemon, Jeffrey P. ;
Liebhold, Andrew M. ;
Gatziolis, Demetrios ;
Mao, Megan Y. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2013, 44 (02) :139-145
[9]   Urban trees and the risk of poor birth outcomes [J].
Donovan, Geoffrey H. ;
Michael, Yvonne L. ;
Butry, David T. ;
Sullivan, Amy D. ;
Chase, John M. .
HEALTH & PLACE, 2011, 17 (01) :390-393
[10]   Indirect management of invasive species through bio-controls: A bioeconomic model of salmon and alewife in Lake Michigan [J].
Fenichel, Eli P. ;
Horan, Richard D. ;
Bence, James R. .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2010, 32 (04) :500-518