Value of concentration and gene methylation analyses of circulating cell-free DNA as diagnostic method for breast cancer: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Xiao [1 ]
Huang, Junming [2 ]
Zhang, Kun [3 ]
Yu, Yinghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, 71 Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Panyu Hosp Chinese Med, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Yantai, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
Breast neoplasms; circulating cell-free DNA; concentration; methy at on; meta-analysis; PROMOTER METHYLATION; ODDS RATIO; TUMOR DNA; PLASMA; SERUM; HYPERMETHYLATION; METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY; MARKER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Many studies focus attention on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration and methylation as means for early detection of breast cancer. However, the results of existing studies are different and it remains difficult to determine the diagnostic role of circulating cfDNA in breast cancer. Therefore, this study performed a meta-analysis to integrate the findings of these published studies and establish the diagnostic value of circulating cfDNA in diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 19 studies were included and divided into three subgroups. Sensitivity, specificity, and other important measures of cfDNA accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques were used to summarize overall accuracy. Results: Summary estimates for cfDNA concentration and gene methylation in diagnosis of breast cancer were as follows: in the subgroup of quantitative analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 0.889 (95%CI = 0.858-0.915) and 0.806 (95%CI = 0.767-0.841); PLR was 5.058 (95%Cl = 2.723-9.392); NLR was 0.150 (95% CI = 0.090-0.251) and DOR value was 42.156 (95% CI = 19.364-91.774). In the subgroup of single-gene indicators, sensitivity and specificity were 0.406 (95%CI = 0.390-0.421) and 0.848 (95% CI = 0.836-0.860); PLR was 4.569 (95% CI = 3.329-6.270); NLR was 0.643 (95% CI = 0.588-0.704) and DOR value was 8.608 (95% CI = 5.679-13.046). In the subgroup of multiple-gene panel, sensitivity and specificity were 0.778 (95% CI = 0.760-0.796) and 0.835 (95% CI = 0.819-0.850); PLR was 6.158 (95% CI = 4.432-8.556); NLR was 0.194 (95% CI = 0.139-0.272) and DOR value was 39.353 (95% CI = 21.139-73.260). Conclusion: Circulating cfDNA concentration and gene methylation analysis might be applied in breast cancer detection since the test has a relatively high level of diagnostic accuracy. If only the single-gene methylation detection assay is used for breast cancer diagnosis, extra caution should be applied. Evaluation of circulating cfDNA concentration and multiple-gene methylation analyses might improve breast cancer early diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:7519 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DNA methylation signatures in circulating cell-free DNA as biomarkers for the early detection of cancer
    Wang, Junyun
    Han, Xiao
    Sun, Yingli
    SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, 60 (04) : 356 - 362
  • [32] Cell-Free Circulating (Tumor) DNA before Surgery as a Prognostic Factor in Non-Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Schraa, Suzanna J.
    van Rooijen, Karlijn L.
    Koopman, Miriam
    Vink, Geraldine R.
    Fijneman, Remond J. A.
    CANCERS, 2022, 14 (09)
  • [33] Diagnostic significance assessment of the circulating cell-free DNA in ovarian cancer: An updated meta-analysis
    Li, Boxuan
    Pu, Ke
    Ge, Long
    Wu, Xinan
    GENE, 2019, 714
  • [34] Value of circulating cell-free DNA in diagnosis of hepatocelluar carcinoma
    Chen, Ken
    Zhang, Hong
    Zhang, Li-Na
    Ju, Shao-Qing
    Qi, Jing
    Huang, Dong-Feng
    Li, Feng
    Wei, Qun
    Zhang, Jing
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (20) : 3143 - 3149
  • [35] Diagnostic performance of circulating cell-free DNA for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Jinmei
    Yuan, Yuan
    Gao, Shuxia
    Zhao, Xue
    Li, Hong
    BIOMARKERS IN MEDICINE, 2021, 15 (03) : 219 - 239
  • [36] Cell-free DNA concentration in patients with clinical or mammographic suspicion of breast cancer
    Peled, Michal
    Agassi, Ravit
    Czeiger, David
    Ariad, Samuel
    Riff, Reut
    Rosenthal, Maia
    Lazarev, Irena
    Novack, Victor
    Yarza, Shaked
    Mizrakli, Yuval
    Douvdevani, Amos
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [37] Diagnostic Value of Serum Concentration and Integrity of Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Breast Cancer: A Comparative Study With CEA and CA 15-3
    Tang, Zijie
    Li, Li
    Shen, Lei
    Shen, Xianjuan
    Ju, Shaoqing
    Cong, Hui
    LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2018, 49 (04) : 323 - 328
  • [38] Circulating Cell-Free DNA in Liquid Biopsies as Potential Biomarker for Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Herranz, Raquel
    Oto, Julia
    Plana, Emma
    Fernandez-Pardo, Alvaro
    Cana, Fernando
    Martinez-Sarmiento, Manuel
    Vera-Donoso, Cesar D.
    Espana, Francisco
    Medina, Pilar
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (06) : 1 - 15
  • [39] Diagnostic value of circulating cell-free DNA levels for hepatocellular carcinoma
    Yan, Linlin
    Chen, Yanhui
    Zhou, Jiyuan
    Zhao, Hong
    Zhang, Henghui
    Wang, Guiqiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 67 : 92 - 97
  • [40] The Prognostic Value of DNA Methylation Markers in Renal Cell Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Peters, Inga
    Merseburger, Axel S.
    Tezval, Hossein
    Lafos, Marcel
    Tabrizi, Pouriya Faraj
    Mazdak, Mehrdad
    Wolters, Mathias
    Kuczyk, Markus A.
    Serth, Juergen
    Von Klot, Christoph-A J.
    KIDNEY CANCER, 2020, 4 (01) : 3 - 13