Value of concentration and gene methylation analyses of circulating cell-free DNA as diagnostic method for breast cancer: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Xiao [1 ]
Huang, Junming [2 ]
Zhang, Kun [3 ]
Yu, Yinghua [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, 71 Hedi Rd, Nanning 530021, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Panyu Hosp Chinese Med, Dept Oncol, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ, Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hosp, Dept Breast Surg, Yantai, Peoples R China
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE | 2018年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
Breast neoplasms; circulating cell-free DNA; concentration; methy at on; meta-analysis; PROMOTER METHYLATION; ODDS RATIO; TUMOR DNA; PLASMA; SERUM; HYPERMETHYLATION; METASTASIS; CARCINOMA; ACCURACY; MARKER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Many studies focus attention on circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) concentration and methylation as means for early detection of breast cancer. However, the results of existing studies are different and it remains difficult to determine the diagnostic role of circulating cfDNA in breast cancer. Therefore, this study performed a meta-analysis to integrate the findings of these published studies and establish the diagnostic value of circulating cfDNA in diagnosis of breast cancer. Methods: A total of 19 studies were included and divided into three subgroups. Sensitivity, specificity, and other important measures of cfDNA accuracy for breast cancer diagnosis were pooled using random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve analysis techniques were used to summarize overall accuracy. Results: Summary estimates for cfDNA concentration and gene methylation in diagnosis of breast cancer were as follows: in the subgroup of quantitative analysis, sensitivity and specificity were 0.889 (95%CI = 0.858-0.915) and 0.806 (95%CI = 0.767-0.841); PLR was 5.058 (95%Cl = 2.723-9.392); NLR was 0.150 (95% CI = 0.090-0.251) and DOR value was 42.156 (95% CI = 19.364-91.774). In the subgroup of single-gene indicators, sensitivity and specificity were 0.406 (95%CI = 0.390-0.421) and 0.848 (95% CI = 0.836-0.860); PLR was 4.569 (95% CI = 3.329-6.270); NLR was 0.643 (95% CI = 0.588-0.704) and DOR value was 8.608 (95% CI = 5.679-13.046). In the subgroup of multiple-gene panel, sensitivity and specificity were 0.778 (95% CI = 0.760-0.796) and 0.835 (95% CI = 0.819-0.850); PLR was 6.158 (95% CI = 4.432-8.556); NLR was 0.194 (95% CI = 0.139-0.272) and DOR value was 39.353 (95% CI = 21.139-73.260). Conclusion: Circulating cfDNA concentration and gene methylation analysis might be applied in breast cancer detection since the test has a relatively high level of diagnostic accuracy. If only the single-gene methylation detection assay is used for breast cancer diagnosis, extra caution should be applied. Evaluation of circulating cfDNA concentration and multiple-gene methylation analyses might improve breast cancer early diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:7519 / +
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Circulating Cell-Free DNA Methylation Profiles in the Early Detection of Ovarian Cancer: A Scoping Review of the Literature
    Guo, Xiaoyue M.
    Miller, Heather
    Matsuo, Koji
    Roman, Lynda D.
    Salhia, Bodour
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 26
  • [22] A Sight of the Diagnostic Value of Aberrant Cell-Free DNA Methylation in Lung Cancer
    Zhao, Hui
    Zhang, Hui
    Xu, Wei
    Wen, Baiqing
    Kang, Yani
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2022, 2022
  • [23] Abnormal DNA methylation as a cell-free circulating DNA biomarker for colorectal cancer detection: A review of literature
    Galanopoulos, Michail
    Tsoukalas, Nikolaos
    Papanikolaou, Ioannis S.
    Tolia, Maria
    Gazouli, Maria
    Mantzaris, Gerassimos J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 9 (04) : 142 - 152
  • [24] Concentration and Methylation of Cell-Free DNA from Blood Plasma as Diagnostic Markers of Renal Cancer
    Skrypkina, Inessa
    Tsyba, Liudmyla
    Onyshchenko, Kateryna
    Morderer, Dmytro
    Kashparova, Olena
    Nikolaienko, Oleksii
    Panasenko, Grigory
    Vozianov, Sergii
    Romanenko, Alina
    Rynditch, Alla
    DISEASE MARKERS, 2016, 2016
  • [25] Cell-Free Circulating DNA: Diagnostic Value in Patients With Testicular Germ Cell Cancer
    Ellinger, Joerg
    Wittkarnp, Volker
    Albers, Peter
    Perabo, Frank G. E.
    Mueller, Stefan C.
    von Ruecker, Alexander
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (01) : 363 - 371
  • [26] Circulating cell-free DNA integrity as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for breast and prostate cancers
    Arko-Boham, Benjamin
    Aryee, Nii Ayite
    Blay, Richard Michael
    Owusu, Ewurama Dedea Ampadu
    Tagoe, Emmanuel Ayitey
    Shackie, Eshirow-Sam Doris
    Debrah, Ama Boatemaa
    Adu-Aryee, Nii Armah
    CANCER GENETICS, 2019, 235 : 65 - 71
  • [27] A DNA Methylation-Based Test for Breast Cancer Detection in Circulating Cell-Free DNA
    Salta, Sofia
    Nunes, Sandra P.
    Fontes-Sousa, Mario
    Lopes, Paula
    Freitas, Micaela
    Caldas, Margarida
    Antunes, Luis
    Castro, Fernando
    Antunes, Pedro
    de Sousa, Susana Palma
    Henrique, Rui
    Jeronimo, Carmen
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (11)
  • [28] Diagnostic value of cell-free DNA in thyroid cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hou, Fei
    Sun, Xiao-Dan
    Deng, Zhi-Yong
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (07) : E32928
  • [29] Circulating cell-free DNA and its integrity as a prognostic marker for breast cancer
    Iqbal, Sobuhi
    Vishnubhatla, Sreenivas
    Raina, Vinod
    Sharma, Surabhi
    Gogia, Ajay
    Deo, Suryanarayana S. V.
    Mathur, Sandeep
    Shukla, Nutan Kumar
    SPRINGERPLUS, 2015, 4
  • [30] Gene Methylation in Circulating Cell-Free DNA from the Blood Plasma as Prognostic and Predictive Factor in Breast Cancer
    S. V. Rykov
    E. A. Filippova
    V. I. Loginov
    E. A. Braga
    Russian Journal of Genetics, 2021, 57 : 1239 - 1252